Property taxes, sales taxes, and fees provide states and local jurisdictions with meaningful funding to support mental health services

brain illustration with dollar signs
© Getty Images

Local governments are increasingly adopting policies that earmark taxes for mental health services, and approximately 30% of the U.S. population lives in a jurisdiction with such a policy, finds a new analysis published in the journal The Milbank Quarterly.

These taxes generate more than $3.57 billion each year—nearly twice the amount spent by the Substance Use and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) on mental health services.

Mental health services are financed through a complex—and often insufficient—mix of federal, state, and local sources in the United States. Improving access to quality mental health services is a growing priority for policymakers and the public alike.

To increase funding for mental health services, state and local governments have been adopting taxes that “earmark” or dedicate revenue for mental health. For instance, in 2005, California’s Mental Health Services Act increased the income tax rate by 1% for households making more than $1 million and earmarked this revenue for mental health services, while Washington State enabled counties to increase their sales tax rate by 0.1% to generate mental health funding.

“A benefit of earmarked taxes is that they are often politically feasible because they guarantee that revenue will be spent on specific issues of public concern, as opposed to being spent at the discretion of elected officials,” said Jonathan Purtle, associate professor of public health policy and management at NYU School of Global Public Health, director of policy research at NYU’s Global Center for Implementation Science, and the study’s lead author. “Earmarked taxes can also secure a stable revenue stream for specific issues.”

Purtle and his colleagues conducted a nationwide assessment of the use of earmarked taxes for mental health services as of 2022. Using interviews and databases, they identified 207 relevant policies; 95.7% were local and 4.3% were at the state level. The vast majority (95.7%) passed via ballot initiative.

They found that more than 100 million people—approximately 30% of the U.S. population—live in a jurisdiction with a tax earmarked for mental health, and these taxes generate more than $3.57 billion annually.

Property taxes (73.9%) and sales taxes or fees (25.1%) were the most commonly used taxes, but policies earmarking taxes for mental health services varied widely in their design, spending requirements, and oversight. Six states with taxes on recreational marijuana mention using the revenue for mental health services. Five states passed laws to add small fees to cell phone bills to finance mental health crisis services, including 988, the new suicide and crisis lifeline.

The revenue generated by earmarked taxes for mental health is substantial in many states and localities. On average, the per capita revenue generated by the taxes was $18.59, but in 63 jurisdictions it exceeded $25 and in 12 jurisdictions it exceeded $50. For context, SAMHSA’s mental health spending in 2021, which totaled $1.8 billion, equates to $5.38 per capita among U.S. residents.

While the number of earmarked taxes for mental health has increased sharply over the past two decades, the researchers also found evidence of taxes being dedicated to mental health care as early as the 1850s, as seen in property taxes in Iowa.

“Our results illustrate an increase in state and local taxes, via ballot initiatives, to meet community mental health needs that are perceived as being unmet by the existing financing arrangements,” said Purtle.

Additional study authors include Megan Wynecoop of the McSilver Institute at NYU, Margaret Crane of Temple University, and Nicole Stadnick of the University of California, San Diego.

About the NYU School of Global Public Health

At the NYU School of Global Public Health (NYU GPH), we are preparing the next generation of public health pioneers with the critical thinking skills, acumen, and entrepreneurial approaches necessary to reinvent the public health paradigm. Devoted to employing a nontraditional, interdisciplinary model, NYU GPH aims to improve health worldwide through a unique blend of global public health studies, research, and practice. The School is located in the heart of New York City and extends to NYU's global network on six continents. Innovation is at the core of our ambitious approach, thinking and teaching. For more, visit:

Press Contact

Rachel Harrison
Rachel Harrison
(212) 998-6797