February 26, 2007
- The public perception of clinical psychologists: A discursive analysis
- Development of community psychology in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand
- Field supervisors' assessments of trainee performance: Are they reliable and valid?
- Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
- Modelling skill acquisition in acquired brain injury
- Accuracy of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) and National Adult Reading Test (NART) when estimating IQ in a healthy Australian sample
- Guide to questioning children during the free-narrative phase of an investigative interview
- Intimate partner violence: What are the impacts on children?
- The public perception of clinical psychologists: A discursive analysis
- Development of community psychology in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand
- Field supervisors' assessments of trainee performance: Are they reliable and valid?
- Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
- Modelling skill acquisition in acquired brain injury
- Accuracy of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) and National Adult Reading Test (NART) when estimating IQ in a healthy Australian sample
- Guide to questioning children during the free-narrative phase of an investigative interview
- Intimate partner violence: What are the impacts on children?