IMPORTANT

With this show in particular, we strongly suggest that you read these notes carefully before the show. (Many members prefer to see the film first, and then read about them). Three of the prints in today's program were almost literally pieced together from the dead, a la Dr. Frankenstein (but without the dubious assistance of Dwight Frye fortunately!). In two of the films, there are no titles, and in the third there is undoubtedly quite a bit of missing footage. We think you'll find the show much easier going if you read about the films first!

TOM MIX and
WILL ROGERS in
"MEN TO REMEMBER"
- - - - - - - - - -
And a documentary
visit to
EASTMAN HOUSE



Charlie Chase's The Rat's Knuckles, announced for this program, has not been forgotten or abandoned; in view of our comedy show next month however, it seemed best to keep it until that time. Incidentally, the highlight of that show will be a recently rediscovered Keaton gem of 1921, The Haunted House.


MEN TO REMEMBER (Columbia, one reel) Produced and written by Ralph Staub


The Screen Snaps series was generally pretty inferior and sloppily put together. This one, devoted to the careers of Will Rogers and Tom Mix, is however, rather good, and a distinct cut above the average. Henry King, Frank Borzage, Sally Blane, Ruth Roland, John Mack Brown, Ted Lewis and others are also shown briefly.

 

THE SHERIFF'S STREAK OF YELLOW (Hart-Ince, Triangle, 1915; two reels)
Directed by and starring William S. Hart

The Sheriff's Streak of Yellow
was Hart's fourth film as a director-star and his best to date. A film not at all unlike High Noon, it's strong, powerful stuff, with less sentiment than was customary with Bill. This may have been partly because Bill had yet to really hit his stride, but it's more likely that it was because it was one of his very few films without a heroine. Bill made the whole film in a few days for a little less than $1200, this including his own (then quite meagre) salary. A word now, about the condition of this print. Silent negatives are rarely stored intact; more often they are split up into little rolls. Usually all the rolls for amber tinting are kept together, all those for blue tinting together, and so on. Titles are kept completely separate, with only a single frame of that title left in the negative rolls for guidance later on. Sometimes even that frame isn't there - but instead just a couple of scrawled words intended as a clue to the title! So it was with this print, which was made up from completely disassembled negative rolls -- and without any title rolls at all. Practically every scene was somewhere that it shouldn't have been, and since there is a flashback to complicate matters, assembling the film wasn't easy. Undoubtedly we have made mistakes in the exact placement of certain scenes. In fact, there is one sequence where Hart is shooting from his cabin window where I know that the cutting doesn't quite jell. However, a film is more complicated than a jigsaw -- once you've assembled it, and discovered errors, you can only correct those errors by resplicing - and losing two frames of film in the process. In the average scene, two frames are not even noticed -- but in this particular shoot-up sequence, some shots only run for five frames, and so it seemed wiser to leave well enough alone. So - if the editing seems a little rough in spots (and of course any film without titles to give it rhythm seems a little disjointed), please blame Bill E. and not Bill H. To help you over the rough spots, here is a bare outline of the plot:

Bill, as the sheriff, is notified that an outlaw is hiding out in a cabin where his mother is dying. Bill leaves ahead of the posse. When he arrives, the outlaw has just buried his mother, and Bill recognises him as a man who had once saved his life. He permits him to escape. The townspeople are outraged, consider Bill a coward, and demand his resignation - which he gives them. Later, the outlaws raid the bank. Bill alone fights them. In a final scuffle, the outlaw leader is shot and dies in his arms, and Bill says (in title) "I reckon we've both paid our debts". The townspeople, ashamed, reinstate Bill as sheriff. This is a good, typical early Hart, and quite a rare one too.

 

A MENDER OF NETS (American Biograph, 1912) Directed by D.W. Griffith; Photographed by Billy Bitzer; starring Mary Pickford, Mabel Normand.


A Mender of Nets
presented exactly the same problem as the Hart film, but because it has a more straightforward story-line, and because Griffith's cutting-patterns are more familiar, it was somewhat easier to assemble. We can guarantee that nothing is in the wrong place, but there does seem to be a short scene missing. After the irate father has closed in on the hero, Mary Pickford prevents murder by leading in his daughter, and telling him that she really loves the hero. It's an important scene, though a very short one, and just why it should be missing from this print (and from the original 35mm negative, which we checked carefully) is just another one of those movie mysteries that will probably never be explained. Possibly the scene was lifted for use in a compilation at one time, and never returned. The plot is something of an embryo An American Tragedy. Mary Pickford and Charles West are fisher folk, very much in love, and planning marriage. But West had earlier seduced a girl who now seems much less attractive to him - Mabel Normand. When Mabel's father overhears her telling West that she is pregnant, he is enraged, and determines to kill him. By now Mary has learned the truth, and stops him. UnseIfishly, she renounces her love so that the two may marry. The titles were all quite lovely in the old Griffith tradition, but only one was really essential, so we'll record it here. It occurs at the very end of the film where Mary is sitting, forlorn, with her fisherman grandfather (Christy Miller). "After all," she sighs, "there must be somebody to mend other people's torn nets". And, on a closeup of Mary, the film fades. At a time when Griffith was concentrating more and more on melodrama, A Mender of Nets is surprisingly sensitive and tender. Mary is particularly good, and Bitzer captures some excellent closeups of her, as well as some very pleasing seascapes.

 

EASTMAN HOUSE 1 1/2 reels  

Those of you who have not yet made the pilgrimage to this acetate mecca should enjoy this documentary coverage of America's foremost film archive - and for that matter, probably the world's no.1 depository of films. The film is split into two sections, dealing first with the purely photographic aspect of Eastman House, and secondly with the movie departments. There are fascinating glimpses of old cameras and projectors, excerpts from silent movies, and even some shots of Eastman's amiable curator, James Card.

 

INTERMISSION

 

B R A S S (Warner Brothers, 1923) A Harry Rapf production, directed by Sidney Franklin; photographed by Nobert Brodine; adapted by Julian Josephson from the novel by Charles G. Norris; Assistant Director - Millard Webb; art director - Estras Hartley; Titles by Sada Cowan; edited by Hal Kern; with MONTE BLUE, MARIE PREVOST, IRENE RICH, Frank Keenan, Harry Myers, Miss Dupont, Cyril Chadwick, Margaret Seddon, Helen Ferguson, Pat O'Malley

There are two rules from which a film society programmer should never - never - stray. One is to attempt to judge a film by an excerpt therefrom. Two is to announce a definite playdate before the print has been examined. For the first (and I can assure you the last) time, we disregarded those two rules. When we showed excerpts from this film on our Christmas show in 1956, it looked quite wonderful - fresh, fast, emminently cinematic. Since that day we've had many requests to run it complete. The longer we waited, the more merit the film seemed to have to those (including myself) to whom it was denied. Now, alas, the film can be seen to fall somewhat short of the standards suggested by its excerpts. Not that it is a bad film, or even an indifferent film. It has considerable merit -- but we suggest that you don't approach it in a mood of optimistic discovery. The second rule was brought home to as after we took a really close look at the print after the announcements had been mailed. Complicated as they were, Mary Pickford and Bill Hart could be pieced together because certain laws of filmic logic in the separating of film for storage, could be followed. Not so here. The print was not a new one, made up from stored negative. It was an original toned print that had been cut, and re-arranged, and separated, for no earthly reason that we could determine. Never having seen the film at all (and attempts to obtain other prints for matching-up purposes proving fruitless) it was literally a case of starting from scratch. What does one do with a shot of a man getting off a trolley-car when there is nothing to indicate where he came from, or where he is going? What does one do when the same subtitle appears in different rolls, but surrounded by different scenes?

After the first day's editing, it became apparent that this was not ALL of the original film, but a later release with (presumably) some additional closing footage. Critics at the time pointed out that audiences were confused and dissatisfied with the climax, which gave no hint at all as to which of the two women the hero would marry. Quite certainly there is no doubt about it here, and the film finishes on a conventional happy note.

After the second day of editing, we got it down to the five reels we are showing tonight. With two sequences of Monte Blue rushing through the San Francisco streets to his wedding, and at least three almost identical sequences of him rushing up to Irene Rich's country cottage, we were more than satiated with Brass, and thus perhaps our earlier comments on it as a disappointment were a trifle harsh. Frankly only a complete Greed or Spione could really justify all the time this little opus took up! However, we wound up with five reels (as opposed to the original 8 or 9) which made sense -- and an additional reel of isolated clips that would have destroyed that sense had we tried to interpolate them. Those isolated clips consisted 50% of ferocious arguments between Monte Blue and Marie Prevost (of which the print in its present form has a plethora anyway) and odd scenes of characters wandering in from left field. (The film has quite a few of those too!) Certainly the addition of those odd scenes would only have clouded the issues further, as well as taking another day of editing -- and if anybody doubts that, I'll gladly give them the clips to do with as they will!

After those anguished paragraphs, let me sum up by saying that the film is obviously far from complete. It has a beginning, middle and end. There are no obvious episodes missing, and no jumps in continuity. It is therefore reasonably representative of the original Brass. There certainly seems to be quite a hex on the works of the Norris Brothers however; it was Charles' brother Frank who wrote McTeague! As a novel, Brass seems to have been of a little sterner stuff than its movie adaptation., and utilised a suicide as one of its plot solutions. The title, by the way, is explained very late in the proceedings -- it refers to a "marriage that glittered like gold - but proved to be a miserable counterfeit - BRASS. Film Daily, condensing the synopsis a bit, said (not too inaccurately) that the plot revolved around the problem of "Marjorie preferring jazz to her baby," and pointed out that its success would be automatic since "it deals with an ever-popular subject - marriage."

The camerawork by the way is quite fine, and the performances of Monte Blue, Irene Rich, and Marie Prevost extremely good.

  - - - - Wm. K. Everson - - - -

Enquiries and program notes; Wm. K. Everson, Manhattan Towers, 2166 Broadway, NYC
Committee: Edward S. Gorey, Charles Shibuk, Dorothy Lovell (art-work)
 © William K. Everson Estate