Newsletter #17 (Winter 1997/1998)
"The Birds and the Bees With More Buzz"
Short biographical treatments of Sanger in many encyclopedias and textbooks continue to portray her as a suburban mom who stumbled into the issue of birth control on her rounds as a visiting nurse in New York's Lower East Side. Her gradual education on this issue during a decade of diligent work as a nurse, a mother, an organizer within the Socialist Party, and as a writer and reporter for several leftist publications remains a relatively unexplored area of Sanger's life. Sanger's involvement in radical politics and society, starting a good five years before she invented the term birth control, is often glossed over largely due to her autobiographical subterfuge. In mid-career, in order to keep herself respectable in the midst of an increasingly popular and broad-based movement, Sanger depicted herself during her more radical years as a tag-along to her Socialist husband and a passive receptor of the latest political trend. "Almost without knowing it," she wrote in her Autobiography about moving to New York City around 1911, "you became a comrade'" (Autobiography, p. 69).Likewise, many scholarly discussions and biographical sketches of Sanger fail to adequately consider her sex education writings previous to the publication of her famously infamous 1914 pamphlet, Family Limitation. Several years before she began agitating for legalized birth control, Sanger's articles on sex education secured many early followers of her work and established her as a credible expert on sex hygiene and a transitional figure in the history of sex education writing.
Two series of articles, What Every Mother Should Know and What Every Girl Should Know, provoked serious discussion about sexuality and served as a primer on sexual hygiene and the birds and the bees for several generations of Americans. Both series appeared in the New York Socialist daily, The Call, from 1911 to 1913, and were republished in book form for more than fifty years. They seem rather straight-laced and sanitized to our present-day, sexually enlightened sensibilities, but few publications at the time included the type of frank language and explicit instruction about basic sex functions found in Sanger's Socialist-tinged articles. Especially in What Every Girl Should Know, Sanger tackled issues such as venereal disease and masturbation, that were seldom mentioned at the time outside of medical literature or were heavily bundled in euphemism.
Sanger's first major writing venture was a kind of accident of assiduous parenting. She and a group of women in the New York suburb of Hastings, where the Sangers resided from about 1906 to 1911, put together little discussions and field trips on the facts of life for their children. Sanger eventually wrote out each "lesson" in story form when Anita Block, the women's page editor of The Call, requested material on sex hygiene and women's health. Titled What Every Mother Should Know, or How Six Little Children Were Taught the Truth, the series included seven chapters (stories) that illustrate and celebrate the "sex function" in both the plant and animal world. Written for mothers to share with their young children (she recommended discussing reproduction with them at about age four), the series is an account of how Sanger and her friends engaged their children in learning about reproduction. Each lesson was crafted around the family unit: the father stamen and mother pistil (alias Mr. and Mrs. Buttercup) who lived within the petals of their bright buttercup house; Mr. and Mrs. Toad, who feel the joy of spring and "together go to the breeding pond;" Mr. and Mrs. Thrush, who did most of their "love-making at sundown in song;" and so on. Though overly cute at times, Sanger does not let her anthropomorphic characters distract the reader from the matter at hand. "I attempted," wrote Sanger in her Autobiography, ". . . to introduce the impersonality of nature in order to break through the rigid consciousness of sex on the part of parents, who were inclined to be too intensely personal about it" (Autobiography, p. 77). Yet Sanger's writing was anything but impersonal; the stories were warm and light and the major themes unfolded gradually. It was in sharp contrast to the facts of life literature of the time which tended to read like a cross between medical text and Sunday school teaching.
Sanger challenged the repressiveness of the day by completely separating sex from the obscene and reintegrating it with nature. She even scolds mothers, parenthetically, for allowing their own prudish natures to restrict their children's understanding. If there is one overriding message in the series it is to be relaxed, open and honest with children in relation to sexuality, advice that seemed innovative at the time, bolstered by examples that may have been better suited to 1960s sensibilities, such as:
When children are very young get them accustomed to the naked body. Let them run about naked at night, perhaps while undressing for bed. Let them bathe together with you. If this is done very early at any early age you will soon find that his thoughts are clean regarding the naked body. You can then tell him the names of the different parts, for he will most likely ask, and his curiosity will often entirely cease. This is the type of boy who looks back upon life and feels he has "always known" the clean and beautiful of life (What Every Mother Should Know, 1914, p. 56; LCM, 131:274).
Yet Sanger remained quite timid, in this first project, about addressing human sexuality in any depth, a noticeable weakness in the stories that may have prompted Anita Block to request a second series dealing specifically with coming of age issues for girls. What Every Girl Should Know, which appeared in installments every Sunday in The Call from November of 1912 to March of 1913, began with a much more fallen view of the world, with Sanger sounding like a troubled preacher:
Students of vice, whether teachers, clergymen, social workers or physicians have been laboring for years to find the cause and cure for vice, and especially for prostitution . . . Upon one point they have been compelled to agree, and that is that IGNORANCE OF THE SEX FUNCTIONS is one of the strongest forces that sends young girls into unclean living (Introduction, MSM C16:0024).
Her essays then were a remedy for such ignorance, presented without "technicalities" or "my
own ideals of morals." In rapid fire fashion, Sanger wrote columns on girlhood, puberty, "sexual
impulse," reproduction, "some of the consequences of ignorance and silence," and menopause.
She discussed sexual anatomy, menstruation, virginity, pregnancy, abortion, masturbation and
venereal disease in frank terms devoid of euphemism. Sanger did not, as some critics charged,
condone pre-marital sex or legalized abortions, she simply upended a few of the sexual myths of
the day (such as the male "sexual organs will become useless unless they are used in early
manhood"), gave her stamp of approval to a few other age old beliefs (masturbation "drains and exhausts the system of the vitality necessary for full development") and shared her knowledge as a mother and trained nurse. Nevertheless, the rendering of such basic information, even in a Socialist newspaper, generated a considerable response. The Call received both letters of outrage: "I am very sorry, indeed, that The Call . . . should be so polluted and have to be banished from our home circle as a paper unfit to be read by our sons and daughters. Such a revolting article I have never read before" (The Call, December 29, 1912). And letters of appreciation: "I am a women of most 66 years and I have learned more from them [Sanger's columns] than from any books or even from my own life, and I am the mother of eight children!" (The Call, March 2, 1913).
Regular readers were not the only ones raising eyebrows and clipping copy. Sanger's explicit discussion of syphilis and gonorrhea under a column headed "Some Consequences of Ignorance and Silence" lured anti-vice crusader Anthony Comstock from his censor's perch. The Post Office banned The Call from the mails forcing the editors to omit Sanger's column. They replaced it by printing "Nothing!" vertically in large type followed by "By Order of the Post Office." The ban was lifted several weeks later following public and political pressure, and The Call published the censored column which also survives in all of the book editions of the series. In one of the first of many comic government turnarounds during Sanger's life, the article on venereal disease, according to historian Linda Gordon, was distributed by the government to U.S. troops during World War I, with of course no credit to the author.
Sanger's brand of feminism may have been even more troubling to the old moral guards against change, though less overtly threatening than references to anatomy and venereal disease. She used What Every Girl as a kind of advertising trailer for her still evolving equation of women's liberation and sexual freedom – the centerpiece of her monthly publication, The Woman Rebel, published just a year later. In her column on sexual impulse Sanger writes, near the end:
"There will no doubt be a great change in woman's attitude on this subject in the next few years. When women gain their economic freedom they will cease being playthings and utilities for men, but will assert themselves and choose the father of their offspring . . . There seems to be a general tendency on the part of the woman who is demanding political freedom to demand sexual freedom also" (Sex Impulse. Part II, p. 2, MSM C16:0046).
What was ostensibly hygiene writing turned, by the end of the series, into rudimentary propaganda for a still unformed movement for women's sexual emancipation.
What Every Girl Should Know also found an extended life in book form. In 1927 Sanger reissued the book with updates and additions under the title What Every Girl and Boy Should Know. She included an expanded section on male anatomy and omitted critiques of capitalism which had punctuated the original series. The book was translated into many languages and republished numerous times in the U.S. and England, as recently as 1980.
Eclipsed by her leadership of the birth control movement, Sanger's contributions as a sex
educator and sexual advice writer have not been sufficiently appraised. Along with several other
contemporaries, two of whom, Antoinette Konikow and William Robinson, both published sex
education articles in The Call, Sanger helped lead sex education away from the chastity message
of 19th century medical advice literature, which was largely focused on the consequences of
greater sexual autonomy for men. Her writing complemented the social hygiene movement of the
early 20th century which advocated sexual education in all facets of society, chiefly to curb
venereal disease, but also to release non-procreative sex from Victorian era associations with
impurity. Sanger extended this discussion to girls (controversial even among progressives of the
day) and women who had little access to instructional or educational literature of any value
since Alice Stockham's sexual advice books published in the 1880s. Sanger contributions to sex
education literature and, of course, her leadership of the birth control movement helped make
women's sexuality, its repression, potential and liberation, the central theme for most of the
important sex education literature of the pre- and post-war eras. Our Bodies
Ourselves, first published in 1971, and scores of other publications devoted to educating women about their
health and sexuality, can trace their lineage directly to Sanger's bold and enlightening first publications.