University Research Challenge Fund Guidelines
For technical assistance, please contact urcf.info@nyu.edu
I. Background
The University Research Challenge Fund (URCF) supports faculty-initiated research on a competitive basis and is administered by the URCF Advisory Committee, composed of senior faculty reflecting a cross-section of disciplines at the University. Since the Fund's inception, the Committee has made 602 awards. Awards in 2009-2010 will be made in a single round of competition.
The purpose of the Fund is:
The URCF Advisory Committee also makes available limited funds for emergency research project needs through the Emergency Research Challenge Fund (ERCF), four times a year.
II. Highlights
III. Eligibility
Proposals are encouraged from individuals or groups of regular faculty members (or others with Principal Investigator [PI] status) in any academic discipline represented at the University, exclusive of the Medical School. Only one proposal per PI will be accepted. The URCF Advisory Committee is particularly interested in receiving proposals from new investigators; however, proposals from established investigators exploring new directions are also welcome.
Proposals for collaborative, interdepartmental, and/or inter-school research are particularly welcome. Please note that awards for projects involving collaboration with institutions outside of NYU are to be used to support the NYU component of the project only. Those seeking URCF support for projects already funded by external sponsors will only be considered in exceptional circumstances, which must be fully explained in the proposal.
The URCF is not meant to provide ongoing support. Repeat applicants will have a lower priority for funding and award recipients for the 2008-2009 round should refrain from applying. Applicants who received URCF award(s) in the last five years must include, where indicated, a brief statement as to its outcome, indicating whether or not it led to external funding.
Unrevised resubmitted applications from previous URCF competitions will not be accepted nor will those from PIs who have failed to fulfill the reporting requirements of a previous URCF award.
IV. Categories of Proposals
The URCF Advisory Committee has established the following categories of support:
Category 1. Proposals which require start-up funds and have a high probability of eventual funding from external agencies. These proposals will usually be new projects, be in fields new to the investigator(s), or support new investigators. If related to existing projects, proposals may be for the exploration of new ideas or new directions. Matching funds may be requested to demonstrate the University’s commitment to a proposal planned for submission to an external sponsor so long as the school and department also expect to contribute to the match.
Category 2. Proposals from disciplines where the expectation of additional external support may be limited (such as the humanities, social sciences, or critical/ theoretical/ historical studies in the arts). Because URCF support is granted for only one year, proposals should focus on:
The foregoing categories are not prescriptive. These guidelines are intentionally broad and investigators should not feel limited by the kinds of constraints frequently set by external funding agencies.
V. Review Criteria
The criteria include:
VI. Proposal Process
Proposal Assistance
A. PROPOSAL FORMAT (COMPONENTS)
Component 1. Completed Proposal Application Package (see Section VII for instructions on completing these forms.) The PDF Forms package may be found at http://www.nyu.edu/osp/funding/urcf.php. This one package contains the application and budget forms. When saving this file for upload, filename should begin with the words “Application Forms”. Save in PDF format.
Component 2. The Project Narrative consists of the following: a. Abstract and Project Statement, b. Project Description, c. Literature Cited
a) Abstract and Project Statement (one page)
Abstract: Answer some or all of the following questions:
- What is the goal of the project (what are intended accomplishments?)?
- What are the project objectives (what is the desired outcome(s))?
- What is the anticipated impact on the field?
- What is the anticipated impact on the PI/Co-PI’s research or that of others?
Project Statement:
- Under which URCF Category of Support does this proposal fall (1 or 2)?
- How does this proposal relate to the interests of the URCF?
- Once the research is completed, how will the results be used?
- What are the plans, if any, for seeking external support?
- If the project has been funded by an external sponsor, please be very clear why URCF support is needed to advance the research.
b) Project Description ( three pages including any pictures, figures or tables)
The three page description of the planned research. Provide answers to some or all of the following questions:
Program Overview and Design:
- What are the project’s scope, size and components?
- What methodology will you employ?
- What is the project’s duration and timeline?
Present State of Knowledge:
- What impact might the project have on the progress or state of knowledge in this field?
Collaborations:
- How might the project benefit from and affect the research of colleagues at NYU or outside NYU?
c. Literature Cited (one page)
Include citation in the style/format of the proposal discipline
When saving the file containing the three sections described above the filename should begin with the work “Narrative”. Save in PDF format.
Component 3. Supporting Letter
Each submission to the URCF must be accompanied by a brief supporting statement from the department chair, dean, or director (or his or her designee). The letter should be explanatory in nature, not simply a standard endorsement, describing, for example, the proposal’s relevance to departmental or school plans for advancing research and education, and assessing the project’s prospects, if any, for future external support. If there is more than one letter of support, please create one PDF file for upload.
When saving this file for upload, filename should begin with the word “Letter”. Save in PDF format.
Component 4. OSP Synopsis Form
An OSP Synopsis form signed by the department chair and dean, must be received by OSP by 5 pm on the deadline. The OSP Synopsis Form is available at http://www.nyu.edu/osp/internal/synopsis/
When saving this file for upload, filename should begin with the word, “Synopsis”. Save in PDF format.
Component 5. Curriculum Vitae (2 pages per person – PI and Co-PI’s only)
When you create your Profile in CAYUSE424, you will upload CV’s for PI and Co-PI’s in the Professional Profile section (If you currently have a profile in the system, you may want to upload a revised CV.) A biosketch prepared in NSF or NIH format may be used. If the PI and Co-PI’s do not have biosketches prepared for either of these agencies, please create CV’s including the following elements:
- Education/Training – (Degree/Year/Field of Study/Institution/Location)
- Research & Professional experience – (Dates/Institution or Employer Name/Position)
- Funding History – (List Proposals submitted/awards received during the past 3 years)
- Publications – (up to ten)
All five components, - 1. Application Form, 2. Project Narrative 3. Supporting Letter 4. OSP Synopsis Form and 5. CV must be in the Cayuse System by 5 pm, December 8, 2009.
B. SUBMITTING PROPOSALS IN CAYUSE424
IF YOU HAVE NOT ALREADY DONE SO. REGISTER NOW FOR Cayuse424 by following this link: http://www.nyu.edu/osp/res/
Leave at least two business days for your registration to be completed.
1. Complete the five required Components. Save these documents as noted above. Instructions for submitting your files can be found at the following link: http://www.nyu.edu/osp/pdf/cayuseinstructurcf.pdf
If you have any questions about this, contact your Projects Officer well in advance of the deadline.
2. Corrections
Once a proposal has been submitted, the application may be updated at any time until the deadline of 5 pm on December 8, 2009.
C. REVIEW PROCEDURES
Proposals will be reviewed by the URCF Advisory Committee members, who may also seek comments from other colleagues from within or outside the University. The proposals and reviews form the content for the Committee's decision-making. The Advisory Committee makes a comprehensive evaluation of each proposal, identifying those they believe to be most meritorious. Decisions (fund/not fund) are expected to be made in mid-April and will be conveyed to applicants and school/departmental officials.
D. AWARDS
In the 2008-2009 competition, 18 awards were made between $8,900 and $19,900; the average award was $12,840.
Awards for a one-year period start no earlier than June 1, 2010. Once the award is acknowledged, and conditions set forth by the URCF Advisory Committee are accepted, an account is established by the Controller’s Division.
E. REPORTING
All award recipients are asked to report on the outcomes of their research. These reports support the continuation of this funding mechanism, which facilitates research and helps to generate larger research initiatives on the part of the faculty.
VII. PROPOSAL APPLICATION PACKAGE
The Application Package may be found on the Research Challenge Fund Website at http://www.nyu.edu/osp/funding/urcf.php.
PLEASE READ ALL DIRECTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING AN APPLICATION.
For all applications:
Documents should be prepared using Arial 11 point type.
Applications must adhere to the page limitations outlined in these instructions. Do not include any supplemental information, such as articles or a more detailed project description. This information will not be reviewed.
A. Proposal FORMS
1. 0 Face Sheet (1 page)
2.0 Current & Pending Support
3.0 URCF/ERCF Support (1 page per person)
4. 0 Budget & Justification – Instructions are included in the application form.
If you have any questions about the procedures or forms, please email urcf.info@nyu.edu or call (212) 998-2121.

