![]() |
|||
|
Page last updated: November, 2003 |
|||
|
SURVEY OF COPY CATALOGING ACCEPTANCE POLICIESI. General background information Number of print monographic titles processed per year____________ ___% of print monographic titles processed with LC copy ___% of print monographic titles processed with Member copy ___% of print monographic titles requiring Original cataloging ___% of print monographic cataloging copy titles processed by students ___% of print monographic cataloging copy titles processed by staff II. Where cataloging is done and how it is being shared (CHECK ALL APPLICABLE): Original Cataloging __ is cataloged directly on OCLC __ is cataloged directly on RLIN __ is batch‑loaded to OCLC __ is batch‑loaded to RLIN __ other (explain) Copy cataloging __ is cataloged by acquisitions staff __ is cataloged by cataloging staff __ is cataloged directly on OCLC __ is cataloged directly on RLIN __ is batch‑loaded to OCLC __ is batch‑loaded to RLIN __other (explain) III. How different types of cataloging copy are handled (CHECK ALL APPLICABLE): Full LC copy (Encoding level “blank”) __ is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is accepted without review __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ local call number assigned CIP copy (Encoding level “8”, 042=pcc) __ is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is re-searched for better copy __ is backlogged and re-searched for better __ is accepted but flagged for future searching for better copy __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ local call number assigned PCC Core LC copy (Encoding level “4”, 042=pcc) __is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is re-searched for better copy __ is backlogged and re-searched for better __ is accepted without review __ is accepted but flagged for future searching for better copy __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ call numbers are verified against the classification schedules __ lacking complete call number __ is backlogged and flagged for future searching for better copy __ is routed to librarians for call number assigning __ is routed to senior copy cataloging staff for call number assigning __ is handled by all copy cataloging staff __ is call number is assigned and added to an 082/050 field __ local call number assigned and record is uploaded to utilities Vendor-created copy (E.g., provisional records created by Casalini, Harrassowitz, Yankee Book Peddler, etc. Encoding level “5”) __ is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is re-searched for better copy __ is backlogged and re-searched for better __ is accepted without review __ is accepted but flagged for future searching for better copy __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ call numbers are verified against the classification schedules __ lacking call number __ is backlogged and flagged for future searching for better copy __ is routed to librarians for call number assigning __ is routed to senior copy cataloging staff for call number assigning __ is handled by all copy cataloging staff __ call number is assigned and added to an 082/050 field __ local call number assigned and record is uploaded to utilities OCLC/RLIN member library full-level cataloging (OCLC Encoding level “I”; RLIN Encoding level “blank”) __ is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is re-searched for better copy __ is backlogged and re-searched for better __ is accepted without review __ is accepted but flagged for future searching for better copy __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ call numbers are verified against the classification schedules __ lacking call number __ is backlogged and flagged for future searching for better copy __ is routed to librarians for call number assigning __ is routed to senior copy cataloging staff for call number assigning __ is handled by all copy cataloging staff __ call number is assigned and added to an 082/050 field __ local call number assigned and record is uploaded to utilities OCLC/RLIN member library PCC full-level cataloging (042=PCC) (Encoding level “blank”) __ is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is re-searched for better __ is backlogged and re-searched for better __ is accepted without review __ is accepted but flagged for future searching for better copy __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ call numbers are verified against the classification schedules __ lacking call number __ is backlogged and flagged for future searching for better copy __ is routed to librarians for call number assigning __ is routed to senior copy cataloging staff for call number assigning __ is handled by all copy cataloging staff __ call number is assigned and added to an 082/050 field __ local call number assigned and record is uploaded to utilities OCLC/RLIN member library PCC core level (Encoding level “4") __ is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is re-searched for better copy __ is backlogged and re-searched for better __ is accepted without review __ is accepted but flagged for future searching for better copy __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ call numbers are verified against the classification schedules __ lacking call number __ is backlogged and flagged for future searching for better copy __ is routed to librarians for call number assigning __ is routed to senior copy cataloging staff for call number assigning __ is handled by all copy cataloging staff __ call number is assigned and added to an 082/050 field __ local call number assigned and record is uploaded to utilities OCLC/RLIN member library less than full (Encoding levels “5” “7”, OCLC Encoding level “M” “K”) __ is handled by students __ is handled by clerical staff __ is handled by senior clerical staff __ is handled by professional catalogers __ is re-searched for better copy __ is backlogged and re-searched for better __ is accepted without review __ is accepted but flagged for future searching for better copy __ name access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ name access points are checked against NAF for accuracy __ 245, 260 are reviewed __ complete description is reviewed __ subject access points are reviewed for typos and obvious errors __ subject access points are checked against SAF for accuracy __ call number is accepted without review __ call numbers are accepted, but final cutter is checked against local shelflist __ call numbers are verified against the classification schedules __ lacking call number __ is backlogged and flagged for future searching for better copy __ is routed to librarians for call number assigning __ is routed to senior copy cataloging staff for call number assigning __ is handled by all copy cataloging staff __ call number is assigned and added to an 082/050 field __ local call number assigned and record is uploaded to utilities IV. Sharing and using recordsCategories of monographic cataloging records that you do not share with the utilities (explain) Categories of monographic cataloging records that you do share with the utilities but, to your knowledge, are not being loaded (explain) What are the barriers to greater copy acceptance? Too much cataloging copy on the utilities needs revision/correction Difficult to upload and share “upgraded” copy Too many types of copy to train staff to evaluate Too many records lack a useable call number Other |