Minds and Machines 

Silver Center 401

Tuesday and Thursday 3:30-4:45

Professor: Ned Block 
ned.block@nyu.edu
Silver Center 502

212-998-8322 (Note: you will have better luck reaching me by email than by phone)
Office Hours: Wednesday
2:45-3:45
and by appointment

 

TA: Erica Roedder

Silver Center 502

ecr216@nyu.edu

212-998-8399
Office Hours: Thursday 2:30-3:30, and by appointment


This course examines the conflict between computational and biological approaches to the mind. Topics covered include whether a machine could think, whether thinking could be symbol crunching, the Turing Test, mental representation, the reduction of the mind to the brain, neural nets, mental imagery, and whether consciousness can be explained materialistically.

 

 



    ATTENTION: The final examination will be in class on Thursday, April 29th, the last class.


ASSIGNMENTS


Remember, no late papers.  If you miss the deadline for one assignment, just do another.

*       Read Jim Pryor’s advice on writing a philosophy paper,  Guidelines on Writing a Philosophy Paper

*       Note: Links below in advance of the NEXT assignment do not work.

*       Assignment 1. Due Thursday, January 29th

*       Assignment 2. Due Tuesday, February 10th

*       Assignment 3. Due Tuesday, February 17th

*       Assignment 4. Due Tuesday, February 24th

*       Assignment 5. Due Tuesday, March 2nd

*       Assignment 6. Due Thursday, March 11th

*       Assignment 7. Due Tuesday, March 23rd

*       Assignment 8. Due Tuesday, April 6th

*       Assignment 9. Due Thursday, April 15th

*       Assignment 10. Due Thursday, April 22ndth

*       Assignment 11. Due Thursday, April 29th

*        

 


TEXT


There is one required book which is available at the NYU Bookstore, David Braddon-Mitchell and Frank Jackson, Philosophy of Mind and Cognition, Blackwell, 1996. (Abbreviated “B&J” below.)  Most of the other readings are available on this website.

The reading for this course is not lengthy but it is difficult material. You should expect to read almost everything twice.

 

In order to access many of the web items on this site, you will need an NYU email account.  If  you have an NYU account, but are not logging in from an NYU site, you will need to tell your browser to use an NYU proxy.  Click here for instructions.

 

 


SYLLABUS


*      Note: The syllabus will be revised periodically

*      Read Jim Pryor’s

*                  Philosophical Terms and Methods

*                  How To Read a Philosophy Paper

 

 

THE TURING TEST

*       A.M. Turing, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence"  Mind 49: 433-460. (This article is widely available in somewhat degraded form on the internet but I have linked to the actual journal issue.)

*       B&J “Behaviorism and Beyond”, 29-41

*       B&J, “Blockhead”,  111-121

*       Ned Block, "The Mind as the Software of the Brain", section 1.1 and 1.2

*       Dan Dennett, “Can Machines Think?”  

*       Stuart Shieber, "Lessons from a Restricted Modern Turing Test"   Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, volume 37, number 6, pages 70-78, 1994.

*       Hugh Loebner, "In Response" (reply to Shieber)  

*       Stuart Shieber, “On Loebner’s Lessons,”   Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, volume 37, number 6, pages 83-84, 1994. 

*       Drew McDermott, "How intelligent is Deep Blue?"  long version of an op.ed. article in New York Times, May 14, 1997

*       Katie Hafner  “In an Ancient Game, Computing’s Future”, or here New York Times, August 2002.  If the link to the New York Times website requires payment, the article is available by doing a search on Lexis-Nexus for Hafner as author.  If you are having trouble from outside NYU, click here.

*      
 Suggested:

*      Online ELIZA Program, or here, or download here

*      The Turing Test Page (a compendium)  

*      The Alan Turing home page

*      Jason Hutchens, "How to Pass the Turing Test by Cheating"

*      Ned Block, “Psychologism and Behaviorismthe Philosophical Review LXXXX, No. 1, January 1981, 5-43

 

SEARLE'S CHINESE ROOM ARGUMENT  

*      Alex Byrne, “Intentionality”, In Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, ed. J. Pfeifer and S. Sarkar (Routledge, forthcoming)

*      John Searle, "Minds, Brains and Programs” (or here)  Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 1980, p.417-424

*      Paul Churchland and Patricia Churchland, "Could a Machine Think?" Scientific American, 1993 (Xerox) 

*      Comments on Searle by John Haugeland, Douglas Hofstadter, William Lycan, John McCarthy, and Marvin Minsky, from  Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980  (Pages 425-6,432-5,439-40) (Xerox) 

*      B&J, “Three Challenges to Functionalism”, 104-111

*      Ned Block, "The Mind as the Software of the Brain", section 1 (after 1.2) and section 2,

*      John Searle, "Is the Brain a Digital Computer?"   APA Presidential Address

 

THE FUNCTIONALIST VIEW OF THE MIND  

*      Ned Block, "What is functionalism", Encyclopedia of Philosophy Supplement (Macmillan)

*      B&J, “Common Sense Functionalism”, 41-59,

*      B&J, “Empirical Functionalisms”, 79-90,

MIND-BRAIN IDENTITY  

*       B&J “The Identity Theory”,  91-103

*       Daniel Stoljar, Physicalism, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

*       Kim Sterelny, “Reductionism in the Philosophy of Mind”. If you are having trouble accessing this item, click here.

*       Brian McLaughlin, "Emergentism", MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science

*        

INTERLUDE ON CONTENT  

*      B&J, “Theory of Reference” 59-78.

*      Kent Bach, “Content: Wide and NarrowIf you are having trouble accessing this item, click here..

*       

 MENTAL REPRESENTATION  

*      Murat Aydede, “The Language of Thought Hypothesis,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

*      B&J, “About Content”, 159-235

*      Ned Block, "The Mind as the Software of the Brain", section 3  

*      Daniel Dennett, "Mind Writing and Brain Reading" (Xerox) 

INSTRUMENTALISM

*      Dan Dennett,Intentional Stance, MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science 

*      B&J, “Instrumentalism and Interpretationism”, 144-158 

FUNCTIONAL ROLE SEMANTICS  

*      Mark Greenberg and Gilbert Harman, “Conceptual Role Semantics”, draft for The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, to be edited by Ernest Lepore and Barry Smith

*      P. Johnson-Laird , “Procedural Semantics”. Cog. 5 3 (1977), pp. 189– 214

*      Jerry Fodor, "Tom Swift and his Procedural Grandmother" Cognition Volume 6, Issue 3, 1978, Pages 229-247.

*      For the Tom Swift allusion, click here.

*      Jerry Fodor, Having Concepts; A Brief Refutation Of The 20th Century”, Mind and Language, February 2004, Vol. 19, 1.  If you have trouble with this link, go to the journal issue here and click on Fodor’s paper.  There are a number of responses to Fodor in this issue and Fodor’s reply.

Suggested but not required reading

*      Ned Block, "Semantics, Conceptual Role", Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

*      Ned Block, "Holism, Mental and Semantic" , Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy 

 

MENTAL IMAGERY 

*      Michael Tarr, “Mental Rotation”, MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science  

*      Stephen Kosslyn, Image and Brain, Ch 1 (The password for this is the same as for the slides)

*      Ned Block, "Mental Pictures and Cognitive Science"  (or here) Philosophical Review  

*      Mazyar Fallah and John Reynolds, “Attention! V1 Neurons Lining Up for Inspection,” Neuron 31,5, 2001

*      Stephen Kosslyn, Giorgio Ganis and William Thompson, Neural Foundations of Imagery, or here, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 9/2001

*      Zenon Pylyshyn, Return of the mental image: Are there pictures in the head? In press, Trends in Cognitive Science (March, 2003) 

*      Stephen Kosslyn, William Thompson, Giorgio Ganis, “Mental Imagery Doesn’t Work Like That”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2002

*      Stephen M. Kosslyn, Giorgio Ganis, William L. Thompson, Mental Imagery: Against the Nihilistic Hypothesis, Trends in Cognitive Science, in press (March, 2003) 

 

*      In addition, there is a very much longer version of the Pylyshyn paper which will not be discussed in class, "Mental Imagery: In Search of a Theory", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2002.  Kosslyn, Thompson and Ganis, above, is a reply to that paper.

*      The Fallah article referenced above summarizes Roelfsema and Spekreijse, “The Representation of Erroneously Perceived Stimuli in the Primary Visual Cortex” in the same issue of the journal.  We won’t be discussing the details, but you might want to have a look at this paper in order to fully understand the summary given by Fallah and Reynolds.

CONSCIOUSNESS  

*       Ned Block, “Some Concepts of Consciousness

*       Daniel Dennett, "Quining Qualia" (Web) 

*       Daniel Dennett and Marcel Kinsbourne, "Time and the Observer: The Where and When of Consciousness in the Brain" and reply (Web) 

*       Nancy Kanwisher, "Neural events and perceptual awareness". Cognition ,pp 89-113 of  Volume 79, Issues 1-2, (April 2001)

*       Daniel Dennett, Are we explaining consciousness yet?, Pages 221-237 of Cognition Volume 79, Issues 1-2, (April 2001)

*       Ned Block "Paradox and Cross Purpose in Recent Work on Consciousness" Better to read this than the version in Cognition.

*       Andy Clark, "Visual Experience and Motor Action: Are the Bonds Too Tight?" Phil Review Oct 2001.

*       Koch, C. and Crick, F.C. The zombie within. Nature (2001) 411, 893-893

  •  
  •  

  


SLIDES


Access to slides is limited to students in the course and requires a password that was given out in class.  If you don’t know the password, send email to ned.block@nyu.edu or ecr216@nyu.edu
 

 Slides from:

*      January 20, 22, 27, 29

*      February 10, 12, 17, 19, 24, 26

*      March 2, 4, 9, 11, 23, 25, 30

*      April 1, 6, 13, 15, 20, 22, 27


REFERENCES


Philosophers use often use ordinary terms in a technical way. If you are having any problems understanding anything, ask or email Professor Block or Erica Roedder. There are also some  reference works that you might also look at:  

*       MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science

*       Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

*       S. Guttenplan, A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell 1994 

*       T. Honderich, The Oxford Companion to Philosophy Oxford 1995 

*       R.. Audi, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge 1995 

*       Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A 'dynamic' encyclopedia, where each entry kept up to date

*       Dictionary of Philosophy of Mind

*       Contemporary Philosophy of Mind: An Annotated Bibliography

 

 

 


REQUIREMENTS, GRADING, AND RULES


  1. There will be a 5 page writing assignment given each week (due the following week). You must choose three of these assignments, including one of the first three, and one in the last half of the course (after Assignment 6).  Otherwise, you can do any three you like. There will be a one hour final examination at the last class, the questions of which will be very similar to questions on the weekly writing assignments. So you should be satisfied that you understand the questions even for assignments that you don't do in writing.   The writing assignments will normally require statements of positions taken by one of the authors that you've read. These statements should be couched in your own words, explaining how you see what the author has said. No quotations; no paraphrases. 
  2. Grading: Each of the three papers will count for 25% of the grade and the final will count for 25% of the grade.  Class participation can move you up a grade but won't be counted as a percentage of your grade.
  3. NO LATE PAPERS
  4. Joint work is encouraged. Arguing about your views with others is the best way to find out where your position leads. If your paper is a product of joint work, al