Back

Prospectus 

 

Audience

Anthropologists, for use in teaching and to keep up with developments in the field, social scientists, academics in history, literature, women’s studies, etc., journalists, high school teachers in social studies, the general public who reads Psychology Today, Mother Jones, Adbusters, Wired, National Geographic, etc., professionals in design, entertainment, knowledge workers (such as corporation employees in management, sales, advertising) of all sorts, city planners, government employees.

 

Organization

We envision the journal being edited with the help of one full-time editor and a staff of university students.  A university home base would facilitate hiring and involving students.

 

Editorial Board

The working group is composed of Dean Birkenkamp, Don Brenneis, Joe Dumit, Susan Harding, Louise Lamphere, George Marcus, Emily Martin, Frances E. Mascia-Lees, Carolyne Quintana, Lorna Rhodes, Dan Segal, Ida Susser and Cara Thoresen.  

 

Relation to the AAA

We expect the magazine to exist independently of the AAA, but with various in kind exchanges.

 

Purposes of the Journal

 
Add to existing media  Some of the traditional subfields of anthropology, especially archaeology, human evolution, and primatology, already enjoy a substantial presence in popular media (such as the NYT Science Times practically every week). But, for whatever reason, cultural anthropological approaches to current social issues do not often get incorporated in existing media.

 

Newsworthy findings When conclusions that have long been anthropological staples, even in introductory courses, are put into a form that is palatable to media expectations, they do cause a stir. The recent excitement over a study done by psychologists on the effects of different languages in relation to different world views is a striking example. By stripping down the complex issues to something simple enough to be captured in a quantifiable study, these psychologists put their findings in a form that was deemed big news. The news coverage of this research even included a condescending reference to inept previous formulations of linguistic relativism made by cultural anthropologists.

 

Enrich public sphere

Much of the social value of a cultural anthropological approach to contemporary social problems is that it attempts to maintain an oblique perspective on mainstream common sense. By looking at received truths, comfortable and taken for granted "facts," the public sphere is enriched and the possibility of vigorous debate and critical inquiry into foundational assumptions more adequately preserved.  Some examples include:

  • Sociobiology. Accounts of human evolution, animal behavior, the activities of corporations and many other topics are often presented in terms that assume the existence of competition, individual agency and choice, and efficiency. Although critiques of this world view, and how limiting it is within the full range of human capacity, abound in anthropology, rarely does any of this counter view get expressed in news coverage. Examples: Natalie Angier and the NYT Science Times, Tim Ingold's article in Anthropology Today.
     
  • HIV and other conditions involving pathogens. Today the ability of individuals, communities, states and international organizations to address HIV/AIDS is as much a cultural, political, social is sue as it is a medical one. The patterns of HIV/AIDS infections now follow the social dimensions of poverty and world inequality and the political/social/cultural definitions of the problem shape those who will live and those who will not. Anthropologists have extensively ad dressed both the changing cultural construction of the disease as well as the efforts at political mobilization to address the problem. These are some of the issues that need to be discussed in ways that reach the public as they are in fact issues that something can be done about. For example, if there was a concerted effort in the U.S. to address the issue of women and HIV including the public discussion of women's sexuality, this would have important ramifications for international NGOs and for the recognition of the problems for women in the Third World. Many anthropologists have been discussing and addressing these issues for decades but their work seldom reaches the general public in a recognizable way.
     
  • Culture. This term, which was for a considerable time part of the technical vocabulary of anthropology, has spread into many other contexts where it is used for a variety of ends. Corporations attempt to design cultures, politicians bemoan violent tendencies in our culture, and artificial intelligence experts try to operationalize the factors that capture how cultures change over time. Gaining the ability to articulate how the anthropological concept of culture differs from these uses is not a matter of asserting professional control over our "property." It is a matter of engaging public awareness that the range of human capacity historically embraces far more than the narrow, western, capitalist-friendly traits of competition, aggression, and individuality. Far more than a stripped-down version of human sociality that stresses unchanged transmission of information over time, culture cannot be reduced to "information," social interaction can not be reduced to "programs" without a devastating loss of the richly layered - mind, body, emotion, aesthetic, etc. - pattern and disorder creation entailed in the most cursory description of an anthropological field experience.
Counter stereotypes Cultural anthropology is often stereotyped, exoticized and practically made into a joke in the media. Important controversies over theoretical issues have been labeled "anthropological cannibalism" in recent news articles. The idea that anthropology has theoretical and methodological discussions with scholarly depth is ridiculed and the debates trivialized (as in Eldorado reportage). Topics such as the lives of the Yanomami or the Ju'\hoansi that cultural anthropology has decades of scholarship to refer to is reduced to a battle of personalities or political interest, as if it was based on nothing but the latest Daily News bulletin. We need to try to publish our own controversies with scholarly respect.

 

Offer unique perspective on current issues

There are many current social issues about which cultural anthropologist have a unique perspective to offer. If this perspective were more accessible to the general public, it would enliven and enrich public debate. Some of these issues are: 

  • Prisons 
  • African American urban communities and the health care system 
  • Issues of gendered violence 
  • Issues of poverty and homelessness 
  • Issues of family and also adoption, international adoption etc. 
  • The question of women working for women as house workers, baby sitters etc. and its relation to undocumented immigration, poverty and the future inequality of access for the children of immigrants 
  • Further questions concerning the new immigrant labor
  • Social implications of DNA as increasingly the most crucial location for health 
  • Growing use of psychopharmacological agents and their impact on concepts of the person 
  • Performance pressure on children in secondary education, US and Japan 
  • DNR orders in hospitals as a battleground between African American patients and white doctors 
  • New reproductive technologies 
  • Changes in family organization 
  • Fundamentalist Christian world view 
  • New technologies of brain imaging

 

Model on other disciplines

Other disciplines have taken an active role in promoting public awareness of their social value. Although the interests of anthropology as a whole are fostered in many ways by the AAA, much more could be done by a committed and energetic group of cultural anthropologists. Some existing models would include Psychology Today, a mass market magazine with a large circulation, Science News, Anthropology Today, Radical Educators, Lingua Franca. Also there are many Newsletters on topics such as Women's Health that are targeted to the general public. Our sister discipline sociology has launched its own general interest magazine, called Contexts.

Disciplines in the natural sciences have long benefited from magazines like Scientific American, The Smithsonian Magazine, or Natural History to increase public awareness of how science works and why it is valuable.

When new areas of scientific research arise, frequently cross-cutting established disciplines, their advocates have often wasted little time marshaling efforts to reach the public, to introduce magazines, radio shows, television shows, web sites, etc. into the mass media, in part to convey information newly discovered, but far more importantly, to introduce a wide public to the benefits of these new research efforts. The Dana Alliance for Brain Initiatives, for example, promotes awareness and appreciation of research on the brain in the public sphere through its web site, a bi-monthly newsletter ("Brainwork"), a weekly research report, a monthly tabloid ("The Brain in the News"), a journal of ideas ("Cerebrum"), a regular series of radio broadcasts ("Gray Matters"), and a television series ("Exploring Your Brain"). It is time cultural anthropologists took a similarly active role in building a public base of support for the social worth of their research.

We will also consider working with people such as Brian Ferguson and others who have organized public conferences on controversial issues such as sociobiological theories or poverty in the US at the American Museum of Natural History, The NY Historical Society, The New York Academy of Sciences and The New York Academy of Medicine - ways to reach a broader audience of professionals or just educated citizens, that we could then publicize or publish in Culture Matters.

We are considering how to recruit grad students to help with this - they might be responsible to write updates on certain topics on a regular basis or to collect materials and review areas that they see as significant topics to be addressed, for example. So far, three graduate students have indicated an interest in helping, and have been actively involved.

 

Posted:  January 30, 2003
E. Martin, New York University
Copyright 2002
All rights reserved.


Back