|

Back
|
Prospectus
Audience
Anthropologists, for
use in teaching and to keep up with developments in the field, social
scientists, academics in history, literature, women’s studies, etc.,
journalists, high school teachers in social studies, the general public
who reads Psychology Today, Mother Jones, Adbusters, Wired,
National Geographic, etc., professionals in design, entertainment,
knowledge workers (such as corporation employees in management, sales,
advertising) of all sorts, city planners, government employees.
Organization
We envision the
journal being edited with the help of one full-time editor and a staff of
university students. A university home base would facilitate hiring
and involving students.
Editorial Board
The working group is composed of Dean Birkenkamp, Don
Brenneis, Joe Dumit, Susan Harding, Louise Lamphere, George Marcus, Emily Martin, Frances
E. Mascia-Lees, Carolyne Quintana, Lorna
Rhodes, Dan Segal, Ida Susser and Cara Thoresen.
Relation
to the AAA
We expect the
magazine to exist independently of the AAA, but with various in kind
exchanges.
Purposes
of the Journal
| Add to existing media |
|
Some of the traditional
subfields of anthropology, especially archaeology, human evolution, and
primatology, already enjoy a substantial presence in popular media (such
as the NYT Science Times practically every week). But, for whatever
reason, cultural anthropological approaches to current social issues do
not often get incorporated in existing media.
|
| Newsworthy findings |
|
When conclusions that have long been anthropological staples, even in
introductory courses, are put into a form that is palatable to media
expectations, they do cause a stir. The recent excitement over a study
done by psychologists on the effects of different languages in relation to
different world views is a striking example. By stripping down the complex
issues to something simple enough to be captured in a quantifiable study,
these psychologists put their findings in a form that was deemed big news.
The news coverage of this research even included a condescending reference
to inept previous formulations of linguistic relativism made by cultural
anthropologists.
|
| Enrich public sphere |
|
Much of the social value of a cultural anthropological approach to
contemporary social problems is that it attempts to maintain an oblique
perspective on mainstream common sense. By looking at received truths,
comfortable and taken for granted "facts," the public sphere is
enriched and the possibility of vigorous debate and critical inquiry into
foundational assumptions more adequately preserved. Some
examples include:
- Sociobiology.
Accounts of human evolution, animal behavior, the activities of
corporations and many other topics are often presented in terms
that assume the existence of competition, individual agency and
choice, and efficiency. Although critiques of this world view,
and how limiting it is within the full range of human capacity,
abound in anthropology, rarely does any of this counter view get
expressed in news coverage. Examples: Natalie Angier and the NYT
Science Times, Tim Ingold's article in Anthropology Today.
- HIV and other
conditions involving pathogens. Today the ability of
individuals, communities, states and international organizations
to address HIV/AIDS is as much a cultural, political, social is
sue as it is a medical one. The patterns of HIV/AIDS infections
now follow the social dimensions of poverty and world inequality
and the political/social/cultural definitions of the problem
shape those who will live and those who will not.
Anthropologists have extensively ad dressed both the changing
cultural construction of the disease as well as the efforts at
political mobilization to address the problem. These are some of
the issues that need to be discussed in ways that reach the
public as they are in fact issues that something can be done
about. For example, if there was a concerted effort in the U.S.
to address the issue of women and HIV including the public
discussion of women's sexuality, this would have important
ramifications for international NGOs and for the recognition of
the problems for women in the Third World. Many anthropologists
have been discussing and addressing these issues for decades but
their work seldom reaches the general public in a recognizable
way.
- Culture. This
term, which was for a considerable time part of the technical
vocabulary of anthropology, has spread into many other contexts
where it is used for a variety of ends. Corporations attempt to
design cultures, politicians bemoan violent tendencies in our
culture, and artificial intelligence experts try to
operationalize the factors that capture how cultures change over
time. Gaining the ability to articulate how the anthropological
concept of culture differs from these uses is not a matter of
asserting professional control over our "property." It
is a matter of engaging public awareness that the range of human
capacity historically embraces far more than the narrow,
western, capitalist-friendly traits of competition, aggression,
and individuality. Far more than a stripped-down version of
human sociality that stresses unchanged transmission of
information over time, culture cannot be reduced to
"information," social interaction can not be reduced
to "programs" without a devastating loss of the richly
layered - mind, body, emotion, aesthetic, etc. - pattern and
disorder creation entailed in the most cursory description of an
anthropological field experience.
|
|
| Counter stereotypes |
|
Cultural anthropology is often stereotyped, exoticized and practically
made into a joke in the media. Important controversies over theoretical
issues have been labeled "anthropological cannibalism" in recent
news articles. The idea that anthropology has theoretical and
methodological discussions with scholarly depth is ridiculed and the
debates trivialized (as in Eldorado reportage). Topics such as the lives
of the Yanomami or the Ju'\hoansi that cultural anthropology has decades
of scholarship to refer to is reduced to a battle of personalities or
political interest, as if it was based on nothing but the latest Daily
News bulletin. We need to try to publish our own controversies with
scholarly respect.
|
| Offer unique perspective on
current issues |
|
There are many current social issues about which
cultural anthropologist have a unique perspective to offer. If this
perspective were more accessible to the general public, it would enliven
and enrich public debate. Some of these issues are:
- Prisons
- African American urban
communities and the health care system
- Issues of gendered
violence
- Issues of poverty and
homelessness
- Issues of family and
also adoption, international adoption etc.
- The question of women
working for women as house workers, baby sitters etc. and its
relation to undocumented immigration, poverty and the future
inequality of access for the children of immigrants
- Further questions
concerning the new immigrant labor
|
- Social implications of
DNA as increasingly the most crucial location for health
- Growing use of
psychopharmacological agents and their impact on concepts of the
person
- Performance pressure on
children in secondary education, US and Japan
- DNR orders in hospitals
as a battleground between African American patients and white
doctors
- New reproductive
technologies
- Changes in family
organization
- Fundamentalist Christian
world view
- New technologies of
brain imaging
|
|
| Model on other disciplines |
|
Other disciplines have taken an active role in promoting public awareness
of their social value. Although the interests of anthropology as a whole
are fostered in many ways by the AAA, much more could be done by a
committed and energetic group of cultural anthropologists. Some existing
models would include Psychology Today, a mass market magazine with
a large circulation, Science News, Anthropology Today, Radical
Educators, Lingua Franca. Also there are many Newsletters on
topics such as Women's Health that are targeted to the general public. Our
sister discipline sociology has launched its own general interest
magazine, called Contexts.
|
Disciplines in the natural
sciences have long benefited from magazines like Scientific American,
The Smithsonian Magazine, or Natural History to increase
public awareness of how science works and why it is valuable.
When new areas of scientific
research arise, frequently cross-cutting established disciplines, their
advocates have often wasted little time marshaling efforts to reach the
public, to introduce magazines, radio shows, television shows, web sites,
etc. into the mass media, in part to convey information newly discovered,
but far more importantly, to introduce a wide public to the benefits of
these new research efforts. The Dana Alliance for Brain Initiatives, for
example, promotes awareness and appreciation of research on the brain in
the public sphere through its web site, a bi-monthly newsletter
("Brainwork"), a weekly research report, a monthly tabloid
("The Brain in the News"), a journal of ideas
("Cerebrum"), a regular series of radio broadcasts ("Gray
Matters"), and a television series ("Exploring Your
Brain"). It is time cultural anthropologists took a similarly active
role in building a public base of support for the social worth of their
research.
We will also consider working
with people such as Brian Ferguson and others who have organized public
conferences on controversial issues such as sociobiological theories or
poverty in the US at the American Museum of Natural History, The NY
Historical Society, The New York Academy of Sciences and The New York
Academy of Medicine - ways to reach a broader audience of professionals or
just educated citizens, that we could then publicize or publish in Culture
Matters.
We are considering how to recruit
grad students to help with this - they might be responsible to write
updates on certain topics on a regular basis or to collect materials and
review areas that they see as significant topics to be addressed, for
example. So far, three graduate students have indicated an interest in
helping, and have been actively involved.
Posted:
January 30, 2003
E. Martin, New York University
Copyright 2002
All rights reserved.

Back
|
|