|
|
|
The APIA Vote
By Jennvine Wong, Special Contributor
November 2nd, 2004 will be the date remembered largely
for the swirl of media attention around this election. Moreover, it is
also the election year that a rise of about 50% growth in Asian American
voter registration culminates from the 2000 elections. Yet, with a growing
population of about 6 million Asian Americans eligible to vote, there
is a much smaller voting bloc numbering at around 3 million that are actually
registered and a trend of only a fraction of them going to the polls to
vote on Election Day. Asian Americans have become infamous for being politically
apathetic. With the effort in voter registration for this past election,
Asian Americans were targeted by Rock the Vote in a short clip titled,
“The Least Likely”. Asian Pacific Islander Americans are the
least likely to vote. Period. The reputation has followed our minority
group shown apparent by the lack of interest from all presidential candidates
despite the 80-20 Initiative pledging an endorsement of our voting bloc
to whichever candidate displays some acknowledgement of the community.
With such a large and ever growing population of eligible Asian American
voters, our community can make a difference in who gets elected. 66% of
Asian Americans are citizens with an overwhelming 75% of the non-citizens
expected to become naturalized citizens. Many of Asian American voters
are residing in states that are crucial swing states; and our vote could
make the difference. What are the reasons for sustaining a political existence
that has consistently and stubbornly remained under the radar? The fact
of the matter is, Asian Americans are overlooked and, as a community,
inactive in major politics. This may have something to do with a general
unawareness about the voting process and politics prevalent in the community;
it may have something to do with history, and it may have sprouted from
our culture.
In the uproar of the 2000 presidential elections, the American people
nationwide were in shock over the state of affairs with the polling sites.
Everyone heard the claims of disenfranchisement, but did anyone hear about
the disenfranchisement here with Asian American voters? Asian-American
voters were asked in disproportionately higher numbers to fill out affidavit,
or paper ballots, because their names could not be found in the registration
book for reasons such as their names being inverted so that their last
name became their first name and vice versa; because they were at the
wrong election district; or because their registration had simply been
lost in the mail en route to the Board of the Elections. In several instances,
Asian-American voters were simply told to leave the poll site and come
back next year. Under the Voting Rights Act, sections 2 and 203, specifically
targeted polling sites are required to provide language assistance to
voters. There have been instances of unavailable or inaccessible translated
materials, hostile poll workers, and outright discrimination. In the 2000
elections, polling sites in Queens were supplied with mistranslated Chinese
ballots in which the party headings were switched so that Democrats were
listed as Republicans and vice versa. The barriers that face the Asian
American community when they choose to exercise their right vote are astonishing
in the year 2004.
In this year’s primaries, I have witnessed in AALDEF’s (Asian
American Legal Defense and Education Fund) Voting Rights Project, poll
workers completely oblivious to the needs and the laws that were made
to help make the voting experience equitable for our community. I witnessed
translated materials left in their unopened packages, shoved behind machines
because they cluttered the table. Meanwhile, there were voters that needed
to enlist the help of interpreters to translate the English ballots when
translated ballots should have been made available. Some were even refused
their right to choose someone to help inside the voting booth. In the
2000 elections, pre- September 11th, South Asian voters were asked at
the polls to show their naturalization papers to prove their citizenship.
Under the Help American Vote Act (HAVA), only first time voters who registered
by mail are required to show ID. Acceptable ID can be anything with a
picture and a name; and there is certainly no mention of naturalization
papers.
The problem does not lie in the legislation of HAVA, but in the discriminatory
application of the law. No other voters, Jewish, Polish, Italian, etc,
were asked to show naturalization papers. Asian Americans are still subject
to the perpetual foreigner stereotype. Asian Americans are faced with
sometimes very discouraging voting experiences. The Voting Rights Act,
sections 2 and 203, federally mandate language assistance to specially
targeted areas because as citizens, we are afforded the right under the
Constitution to be fully aware of the voting process, in English or not.
In New York, these languages are Spanish, Chinese, and Korean. Yet, even
in such heavily Asian populated areas where Chinese and Korean are languages
that are federally mandated, there are sometimes translated materials
entirely missing or hidden behind the voting booth because poll workers
were not told to keep materials out on the tables. Interpreters are often
missing or are isolated and not accessible. At one polling site in Queens,
Chinese interpreters were refused seats and made to stand all day and
also needed permission from the poll site coordinator in order to leave
to use restrooms.
Anti-Asian sentiments have run as recently as the 1940’s. Asians
were the first minority group to be excluded from the American Dream through
legislation. The Chinese Exclusion Act was the first sign of this when
in the late 1800’s the Chinese first began immigrating to California
during the gold rush. Chinese laborers were welcome to fill in the void
of cheap labor, but they were not welcome to stay. Following the Chinese,
every other Asian race became distinctly excluded from America through
the Immigration Acts of 1917 and 1924. Filipinos, at the time were still
allowed to immigrate in limited numbers until the early 1900’s after
the Philippines gained independence from the U.S., they too were excluded.
Anyone from any part of Asia, spanning China to India, was being excluded.
Even children of Asian descent were subject to being deported or have
their citizenship challenged. Asian immigrants were not allowed to become
naturalized citizens. In the wake of World War II, Japanese Americans,
citizens and non citizens alike, were subjected to internment having their
civil liberties and constitutional rights stripped away. Thus, the notion
of Asian Americans being viewed as the perpetual foreigner certainly has
its roots planted from as far back as from the days of the Chinese Exclusion
Act and Immigrations Acts of 1917 and 1924 which remained in place until
as recently as the 1940’s, no less than 60 years ago.
Let’s face it; Asian Americans have grown to become visibly successful
in the past few decades. This has only made our community’s issues
silent. As model minorities, we have gained one of the highest percentages
of higher education for our children. We have climbed the corporate ladder,
and we have established for ourselves a better life than the ones many
of our parents led on the other side of the world. Our parents, our grandparents,
and generations before us, have immigrated to the U.S. looking for opportunities
that were not offered in their countries; they immigrated searching for
opportunities to better education, income, and livelihood. There are still
Asian-Americans seeking for that better life today. Whether they are immigrants
or second-generation Asian-Americans seeking to break through their traditional
Asian shell, one of the most effective ways to do this is through political
action. New York is home to a growing 800,000 Asian American population.
The number of elected officials that represent the Asian electorate or
are Asian is dismal in comparison.
With so many problems, how can our community remain silent? The Asian-American
community is different from the African-American or Hispanic communities;
we do not speak up. We do not have a long history of fighting for our
civil rights and raising our voices loudly so the government can hear
us. We often times, do not even want to give our names. The approach to
protecting the civil rights of Asian-Americans has to be a unique approach.
We can not use the same technique that has worked so well for other minority
groups. When one of us is told, “Go back to your country,”
we must be able to find a way to speak clearly, articulately, and loudly
enough so that everyone can hear, “This is my country, and I’m
already here.”
|
|
|