Exact solutions of the Ising model in 1 and 2 dimensions next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Mean field theory calculation

Exact solutions of the Ising model in 1 and 2 dimensions

Exact solutions of the Ising model are possible in 1 and 2 dimensions and can be used to calculate the exact critical exponents for the two corresponding universality classes.

In one dimension, the Ising Hamiltonian becomes:

displaymath251

which corresponds to N spins on a line. We will impose periodic boundary conditions on the spins so that tex2html_wrap_inline710 . Thus, the topology of the spin space is that of a circle. Finally, let all sites be equivalent, so that tex2html_wrap_inline712 . Then,

displaymath259

The partition function is then

displaymath264

In order to carry out the spin sum, let us define a matrix P with matrix elements:

eqnarray272

The matrix P is called the transfer matrix. Thus, the matrix P is a 2 tex2html_wrap_inline716 2 matrix given by

displaymath283

so that the partition function becomes

eqnarray290

A simple way to carry out the trace is diagonalize the matrix, tex2html_wrap_inline718 . From

displaymath304

the eigenvalues can be seen to be

displaymath309

where tex2html_wrap_inline720 corresponds to the choice of + in the eigenvalue expression, etc.

The trace of the tex2html_wrap_inline722 is then

displaymath317

We will be interested in the thermodynamic limit. Note that tex2html_wrap_inline724 for any h, so that as tex2html_wrap_inline728 , tex2html_wrap_inline730 dominates over tex2html_wrap_inline732 . Thus, in this limit, the partition function has the single term:

displaymath321

Thus, the free energy per spin becomes

eqnarray323

and the magnetization becomes

eqnarray328

which, as tex2html_wrap_inline734 , since tex2html_wrap_inline736 and tex2html_wrap_inline738 , itself vanishes. Thus, there is no magnetization at any finite temperature in one dimension, hence no nontrivial critical point.

While the one-dimensional Ising model is a relatively simple problem to solve, the two-dimensional Ising model is highly nontrivial. It was only the pure mathematical genius of Lars Onsager that was able to find an analytical solution to the two-dimensional Ising model. This, then, gives an exact set of critical exponents for the d=2, n=1 universality class. To date, the three-dimensional Ising model remains unsolved.

Here, the Onsager solution will be outlined only and the results stated. Consider a two-dimension spin-lattice as shown below:

   figure344
Figure 4:

The Hamiltonian can be written as

displaymath352

where the spins are now indexed by two indices corresponding to a point on the 2-dimensional lattice. Introduce a shorthand notation for H:

displaymath361

where

eqnarray365

and tex2html_wrap_inline746 is defined to be a set of spins in a particular column:

displaymath374

Then, define a transfer matrix P, with matrix elements:

displaymath378

which is a tex2html_wrap_inline748 matrix. The partition function will be given by

displaymath382

and, like, in the one-dimensional case, the largest eigenvalue of P is sought. This is the nontrivial problem that is worked out in 20 pages in Huang's book.

In the thermodynamic limit, the final result at zero field is:

displaymath386

where

displaymath393

The energy per spin is

displaymath397

where

displaymath404

The magnetization, then, becomes

displaymath407

for tex2html_wrap_inline622 and 0 for tex2html_wrap_inline638 , indicating the presence of an order-disorder phase transition at zero field. The condition for determining the critical temperature at which this phase transition occurs turns out to be

eqnarray412

Near tex2html_wrap_inline756 , the heat capacity per spin is given by

displaymath415

Thus, the heat capacity can be seen to diverge logarithmically as tex2html_wrap_inline648 .

The critical exponents computed from the Onsager solution are

eqnarray423

which are a set of exact exponents for the d=2, n=1 universality class.


next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Mean field theory calculation

Mark Tuckerman
Sun May 2 22:51:55 EDT 1999