Review of the Van der Waals theory next up previous
Next: Magnetic systems and the Up: Overview of critical phenomena Previous: Overview of critical phenomena

Review of the Van der Waals theory

Recall that the Van der Waals equation of state was derived earlier by perturbation theory. The unperturbed Hamiltonian describes a system of hard spheres and is given by

displaymath138

and a perturbation of the form

displaymath145

where tex2html_wrap_inline477 is the hard-sphere potential given by

displaymath150

and tex2html_wrap_inline479 is an arbitrary attractive potential. In the low density limit, we had

displaymath153

and the free energy was determined to be

displaymath156

with

eqnarray162

The equation of state takes the form

displaymath167

The critical point is defined by the conditions:

displaymath170

which leads to the following values for the critical pressure, temperature and density:

displaymath174

The critical exponents predicted by the theory are as follows:

1.
The internal energy is given by

displaymath180

from which it can be seen that the heat capacity is

displaymath184

tex2html_wrap_inline481 .

2.
The isothermal compressibility can be expressed as

displaymath189

and

displaymath192

so that

displaymath198

tex2html_wrap_inline483

3.
By Taylor expanding the equation of state about the critical pressure and density, it is easy to show that

displaymath202

tex2html_wrap_inline485

4.
The exponent tex2html_wrap_inline487 can be computed using the Maxwell construction (see problem set 11), which attempts to fix the fact that the Van der Waals equation has an unphysical region where tex2html_wrap_inline489 . The Maxwell construction is illustrated below:

   figure210
Figure 3:

When the Maxwell construction is carried out, it can be shown that

displaymath218

tex2html_wrap_inline491 .

The following table compares the Van der Waals exponents to the experimental critical exponents:

   figure225
Figure 4:

Thus, one sees that the Van der Waals theory is only qualitatively correct, but not quantitatively. It is an example of a mean field theory.



Mark Tuckerman
Fri Apr 30 17:00:54 EDT 1999