Derivation of the GLE next up previous
Next: Properties of the GLE Up: No Title Previous: The harmonic bath Hamiltonian

Derivation of the GLE

The GLE can be derived from the harmonic bath Hamiltonian by simply solving Hamilton's equations of motion, which take the form

eqnarray98

This set of equations can also be written as second order differential equation:

eqnarray108

In order to derive an equation for q, we solve explicitly for the dynamics of the bath variables and then substitute into the equation for q. The equation for tex2html_wrap_inline1081 is a second order inhomogeneous differential equation, which can be solved by Laplace transforms. We simply take the Laplace transform of both sides. Denote the Laplace transforms of q and tex2html_wrap_inline1081 as

eqnarray113

and recognizing that

displaymath119

we obtain the following equation for tex2html_wrap_inline1095 :

displaymath123

or

displaymath126

tex2html_wrap_inline1097 can be obtained by inverse Laplace transformation, which is equivalent to a contour integral in the complex s-plane around a contour that encloses all the poles of the integrand. This contour is known as the Bromwich contour. To see how this works, consider the first term in the above expression. The inverse Laplace transform is

displaymath133

The integrand has two poles on the imaginary s-axis at tex2html_wrap_inline1103 . Integration over the contour that encloses these poles picks up both residues from these poles. Since the poles are simple poles, then, from the residue theorem:

displaymath139

By the same method, the second term will give tex2html_wrap_inline1105 . The last term is the inverse Laplace transform of a product of tex2html_wrap_inline1107 and tex2html_wrap_inline1109 . From the convolution theorem of Laplace transforms, the Laplace transform of a convolution gives the product of Laplace transforms:

displaymath146

Thus, the last term will be the convolution of q(t) with tex2html_wrap_inline1105 . Putting these results together, gives, as the solution for tex2html_wrap_inline1097 :

displaymath152

The convolution term can be expressed in terms of tex2html_wrap_inline1117 rather than q by integrating it by parts:

displaymath157

The reasons for preferring this form will be made clear shortly. The bath variables can now be seen to evolve according to

displaymath163

Substituting this into the equation of motion for q, we find

displaymath169

We now introduce the following notation for the sums over bath modes appearing in this equation:

1.
Define a dynamic friction kernel

displaymath181

2.
Define a random force

displaymath185

Using these definitions, the equation of motion for q reads

  equation190

Eq. (1) is known as the generalized Langevin equation. Note that it takes the form of a one-dimensional particle subject to a potential tex2html_wrap_inline1077 , driven by a forcing function R(t) and with a nonlocal (in time) damping term tex2html_wrap_inline1129 , which depends, in general, on the entire history of the evolution of q. The GLE is often taken as a phenomenological equation of motion for a coordinate q coupled to a general bath. In this spirit, it is worth taking a moment to discuss the physical meaning of the terms appearing in the equation.


next up previous
Next: Properties of the GLE Up: No Title Previous: The harmonic bath Hamiltonian

Mark Tuckerman
Thu Apr 27 14:44:56 EDT 2000