The high density, #tex2html_wrap_inline666# limit next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Low densitysmall limit

The high density, tex2html_wrap_inline630 limit

The tex2html_wrap_inline630 limit is the limit of maximum chemical potential, which is expected at high density. However, since tex2html_wrap_inline670 , maximum chemical potential will be the limit tex2html_wrap_inline672 . In this limit, the full problem, including the divergent terms, must be solved:

eqnarray144

We will need to refer to these two sums often in this section, so let us define them to be

eqnarray157

Thus, the problem becomes one of solving

eqnarray165

We examine, first the density equation. The second term will diverge at tex2html_wrap_inline674 . It is instructive to ask what is the behavior of the first term tex2html_wrap_inline676 at tex2html_wrap_inline674 . In fact tex2html_wrap_inline680 is nothing but a Riemann zeta-function:

displaymath172

In general, a Riemann zeta-function R(n) is given by

displaymath177

and the values of this function are given in many standard math tables. The particles value of R(3/2) is approximately 2.612... Moreover, from the form of tex2html_wrap_inline676 , it is clear that, since tex2html_wrap_inline688 , tex2html_wrap_inline680 is the maximum value of tex2html_wrap_inline676 . A plot of tex2html_wrap_inline676 is given below:

   figure183
Figure 1:

The figure also indicates that the derivative tex2html_wrap_inline696 diverges at tex2html_wrap_inline674 despite the fact that the value of the function is finite. Note that, since tex2html_wrap_inline688

displaymath192

It is possible to solve the density equation for tex2html_wrap_inline628 by noting that unless tex2html_wrap_inline628 is very close to 1, the divergent term will still vanish in the thermodynamic limit as a result of its tex2html_wrap_inline658 prefactor. How close to 1 must it be for this term to dominate? It can only be different from 1 by an amount on the order of 1/V. Thus, let us take tex2html_wrap_inline628 to be of the form

displaymath194

where a is a positive constant. Substituting this ansatz into the equation for the density gives

displaymath197

Since tex2html_wrap_inline676 does not change its value much if tex2html_wrap_inline628 is displaced just a little from 1, we can replace the first term by R(3/2). Then,

displaymath203

can be solved for a to yield

displaymath209

where we have neglected a term tex2html_wrap_inline658 , which vanishes in the thermodynamic limit. Since a must be positive, this solution is only valid for tex2html_wrap_inline726 . For tex2html_wrap_inline728 , tex2html_wrap_inline628 will be different from 1 by more than an amount 1/V so in this regime, the tex2html_wrap_inline734 term can be neglected, leaving the problem of solving tex2html_wrap_inline736 . Therefore, the solution for tex2html_wrap_inline628 can be expressed as

displaymath212

which, in the thermodynamic limit, becomes

displaymath219

A plot of tex2html_wrap_inline628 vs. tex2html_wrap_inline742 is shown below:

   figure226
Figure 2:

Clearly, point R(3/2) is special, as tex2html_wrap_inline628 undergoes a transition there to a constant value of 1.

Recall that the occupation of the ground state is

displaymath108

Thus, for tex2html_wrap_inline748 , this becomes

displaymath237

for tex2html_wrap_inline726 . At tex2html_wrap_inline752 the occupation of the ground state becomes 0. To what temperature does this correspond? We can find this out by solving

eqnarray242

so that for temperatures less than tex2html_wrap_inline754 the occupation of the ground state becomes

eqnarray251

Thus, at T=0

displaymath269

which is equivalent to

displaymath272

If we sum both sides over m, this gives

eqnarray276

where tex2html_wrap_inline760 indicates that the spin degeneracy has been summed over. For tex2html_wrap_inline762 , tex2html_wrap_inline728 and tex2html_wrap_inline628 is not within 1/V of 1. This means that tex2html_wrap_inline734 is finite and

displaymath282

as tex2html_wrap_inline772 . Therefore, we have, for the occupation of the ground state:

displaymath287

which is shown in the figure below:

   figure292
Figure 3:

The occupation of the ground state undergoes a transition from a finite value to 0 at tex2html_wrap_inline774 and for all higher temperatures, remains 0. Now, tex2html_wrap_inline776 represents the probability that a particle will be found in the ground state. It also represents the fraction of the total number of particles that will be found in the ground state. For tex2html_wrap_inline778 , this number is very close to 1, and at T=0, it becomes exactly 1, implying that at T=0 all particles will be found in the ground state. This is a phenomenon known as Bose-Einstein condensation. The occupation number of the ground state as a function of temperature is shown in the plot below:

Note that there is also a critical density corresponding to this temperature. This will be given by the solution of

displaymath302

which can be solved to yield

displaymath305

and the occupation number, expressed in terms of the density is

displaymath310

The term in the pressure equation

displaymath314

becomes, for tex2html_wrap_inline628 very close to 1

displaymath317

which clearly vanishes in the thermodynamic limit, since tex2html_wrap_inline786 . This allows to deduce the equation of state as

displaymath321

where tex2html_wrap_inline628 in the above equation comes from the actual solution of tex2html_wrap_inline736 . What is particularly interesting to note about the equation of state is that the pressure is independent of the density for tex2html_wrap_inline792 . Isotherms of the ideal Bose gas are shown below:

   figure327
Figure 4:

Here, tex2html_wrap_inline794 corresponds to the critical density tex2html_wrap_inline796 . As a function of temperature, we see that tex2html_wrap_inline798 , which is quite different from the classical ideal gas. This is also in contrast to the fermion ideal gas, where as tex2html_wrap_inline800 the pressure remains finite. For the Boson gas, as tex2html_wrap_inline800 the pressure vanishes, in keeping with the notion of an ``effective'' attraction between the particles.

Other thermodynamic quantities can be determined in a similar manner. The energy can be obtained from E=3PV/2 straightforwardly:

displaymath336

and the heat capacity at constant volume from

displaymath342

which gives

displaymath345

A plot of the heat capacity exhibits a cusp at tex2html_wrap_inline774 :

   figure355
Figure 5:

Experiments carried out on liquid He tex2html_wrap_inline808 , which has been observed to undergo Bose-Einstein condensation at around T=2.18 K, have measured an actual discontinuity in the heat capacity at the transition temperature, suggesting that Bose-Einstein condensation is a phase transition known as the tex2html_wrap_inline812 transition. The experimental heat capacity is shown roughly below:

   figure364
Figure 6:

By contrast, the ideal Bose gas undergoes a first order phase transition. However, using the mass and density of liquid He tex2html_wrap_inline808 in the expression for tex2html_wrap_inline754 given above, one would predict that tex2html_wrap_inline754 is about 3.14 K, which is not far off the experimental transition temperature of 2.18 K for real liquid helium.

For completeness, other thermodynamic properties of the ideal Bose gas are given as follows: The entropy is

displaymath372

The Gibbs free energy is given by

displaymath379

It is clear from the analysis of this and the fermion ideal gas that quantum statistics give rise to an enormously rich behavior, even when there are no particle interactions!


next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: Low densitysmall limit

Mark Tuckerman
Sat Jan 4 22:50:24 EST 2003