General formulation for fermions and bosons next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: An ideal gas of

General formulation for fermions and bosons

For systems of identical femions and identical bosons, an exchange of particles does not change the physical state. Therefore the factor tex2html_wrap_inline885 is just 1 for both of kinds of systems. Moreover, the occupation number of a state characterized by tex2html_wrap_inline843 for a system of identical bosons can be any number between 0 and N:

displaymath365

For fermions, the Pauli exclusion principle forbids two identical particles from occupying the same quantum state. This restricts the occupation numbers to be either 0 or 1:

displaymath368

Given these possibilities for the occupation numbers, the canonical partition function can be formulated:

displaymath371

Note that the sum over occupation numbers must be performed subject to the restriction

displaymath264

a condition that makes the evaluation of Q(N,V,T) extremely difficult. Therefore, it seems that the canonical ensemble is not the best choice for carrying out the calculation. No worry, there are other ensembles from which to choose, and of these, it turns out that the grand canonical ensemble is significantly easier to work with. Recall that in the grand canonical ensemble, tex2html_wrap_inline895 , V and T are the control variables and the partition function is given by

eqnarray385

Note that the inner sum over occupation numbers is still subject to the restriction tex2html_wrap_inline901 . However, there is a final sum over all possible values that N, the number that restricts the sum over occupation numbers, can take on. Therefore, if we let the sum over occupation numbers be unrestricted, then they could sum to any value they liked. This would be equivalent to performing an unrestricted sum over occupation numbers without performing the final sum over N, since in the course of summing, unrestricted, over occupation numbers, we would obtain every possible value of N as required by the final sum over N. This is the main advantage of using this ensemble for bosonic and fermonic systems. Thus, the grand canonical partition function becomes

displaymath399

Note also that the sum of products is just

eqnarray406

For bosons, each individual sum is just the sum of a geometric series. Hence,

displaymath424

whereas, for fermions, each individual sum contains only two terms corresponding to tex2html_wrap_inline911 and tex2html_wrap_inline913 . Thus, for fermions:

displaymath431

Note that the summands are independent of the quantum number m so that we may perform the product over m values trivially with the result

displaymath436

for bosons and

displaymath441

for fermions, where g=(2s+1) is the number of eigenstates of tex2html_wrap_inline663 (also known as the spin degeneracy).

At this point, let us recall the procedure for calculating the equation of state in the grand canonical ensemble. The free energy in this ensemble is PV/kT given by

displaymath447

and the average particle number is given by

displaymath451

The fugacity tex2html_wrap_inline925 must be eliminated in favor of tex2html_wrap_inline927 using the second equation and substituted into the first equation to yield the equation of state. Recall that, for the classical ideal gas,

eqnarray455

Eliminating tex2html_wrap_inline925 in favor tex2html_wrap_inline927 is trivial in this case, leading to the classical ideal gas equation

displaymath464

For the ideal gas of identical fermions, the equations one must solve are

eqnarray466

and for bosons, they are

eqnarray479

It is not difficult to see that the problem of solving for tex2html_wrap_inline925 in terms of tex2html_wrap_inline927 is highly non-trivial for both systems. The next two lectures will be devoted to just this problem and exploring the rich behavior that the quantum ideal gases exhibit.


next up previous
Next: About this document Up: No Title Previous: An ideal gas of

Mark Tuckerman
Sat Jan 4 20:59:57 EST 2003