Dominant paths in the propagator and density matrix next up previous
Next: Doing the path integral: Up: The functional integral representation Previous: The continuous limit

Dominant paths in the propagator and density matrix

Let us first consider the real time quantum propagator. The quantity appearing in the exponential is an integral of

displaymath147

which is known as the Lagrangian in classical mechanics. We can ask, which paths will contribute most to the integral

displaymath152

known as the action integral. Since we are integrating over a complex exponential tex2html_wrap_inline470 , which is oscillatory, those paths away from which small deviations cause no change in S (at least to first order) will give rise to the dominant contribution. Other paths that cause tex2html_wrap_inline470 to oscillate rapidly as we change from one path to another will give rise to phase decoherence and will ultimately cancel when integrated over. Thus, we consider two paths x(s) and a nearby one constructed from it tex2html_wrap_inline478 and demand that the change in S between these paths be 0

displaymath158

Note that, since x(0)=x and x(t)=x', tex2html_wrap_inline486 , since all paths must begin at x and end at x'. The change in S is

displaymath161

Expanding the first term to first order in tex2html_wrap_inline494 , we obtain

displaymath166

The term proportional to tex2html_wrap_inline496 can be handled by an integration by parts:

displaymath177

because tex2html_wrap_inline494 vanishes at 0 and t, the surface term is 0, leaving us with

displaymath186

Since the variation itself is arbitrary, the only way the integral can vanish, in general, is if the term in brackets vanishes:

displaymath191

This is known as the Euler-Lagrange equation in classical mechanics. For the case that tex2html_wrap_inline504 , they give

eqnarray197

which is just Newton's equation of motion, subject to the conditions that x(0)=x, x(t)=x'. Thus, the classical path and those near it contribute the most to the path integral.

The classical path condition was derived by requiring that tex2html_wrap_inline510 to first order. This is known as an action stationarity principle. However, it turns out that there is also a principle of least action, which states that the classical path minimizes the action as well. This is an important consideration when deriving the dominant paths for the density matrix, which takes the form

displaymath206

The action appearing in this expression is

displaymath215

which is known as the Euclidean action and is just the integral over a path of the total energy or Euclidean Lagrangian tex2html_wrap_inline512 . Here, we see that a minimum action principle is needed, since the smallest values of tex2html_wrap_inline514 will contribute most to the integral. Again, we require that to first order tex2html_wrap_inline516 . Applying the same logic as before, we obtain the condition

eqnarray225

which is just Newton's equation of motion on the inverted potential surface -U(x), subject to the conditions x(0)=x, tex2html_wrap_inline522 . For the partition function tex2html_wrap_inline524 , the same equation of motion must be solved, but subject to the conditions that tex2html_wrap_inline430 , i.e., periodic paths.


next up previous
Next: Doing the path integral: Up: The functional integral representation Previous: The continuous limit

Mark Tuckerman
Fri Mar 10 17:55:03 EST 2000