next up previous
: この文書について... : lecture_5 : Amending the postulates of

Explicit description of spin-1/2

The Hilbert space of a spin-1/2 particle is two-dimensional. Moreover, $m_s$, the $S_z$ eigenvalue, can take on two values $-1/2$ and $1/2$. Therefore, $S_z$ should be represented by a 2$\times$2 matrix. If we choose to work in a basis in which $S_z$ is diagonal, then as a matrix, it will be given by

\begin{displaymath}
S_z={\left(\matrix{{\hbar \over 2} & 0 \cr 0 & -{\hbar \over 2}}\right)}
\end{displaymath}

The two eigenvectors are
$\displaystyle \left\vert m_s = {1 \over 2}\right>$ $\textstyle \equiv$ $\displaystyle \left\vert{1 \over 2}\right>. = {\left(\matrix{1 \cr 0}\right)}$  
$\displaystyle \left\vert m_s = -{1 \over 2}\right>$ $\textstyle \equiv$ $\displaystyle \left\vert-{1 \over 2}\right> = {\left(\matrix{0 \cr 1}\right)}$  

These clearly satisfy
$\displaystyle {\left<{1 \over 2}\right.}{\left\vert{1 \over 2}\right>}$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\left<-{1 \over 2}\right.}{\left\vert-{1 \over 2}\right>}= 1$  
$\displaystyle {\left<{1 \over 2}\right.}{\left\vert-{1 \over 2}\right>}$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\left<-{1 \over 2}\right.}{\left\vert{1 \over 2}\right>}= 0$  

Thus, they form an orthonormal set of vectors and span the Hilbert space ${\cal H}_s$. The other spin operators are

\begin{displaymath}
S_x={\left(\matrix{0 & {\hbar \over 2} \cr {\hbar \over 2} &...
...matrix{0 & -{i\hbar \over 2} \cr {i\hbar \over 2} & 0}\right)}
\end{displaymath}

It is straightforward to show that these satisfy the commutation relations ${\bf S}\times {\bf S}= i\hbar {\bf S}$ and both have eigenvalues $\pm \hbar/2$.

Let us use these to calculate the Casimir operator $S^2$:

$\displaystyle S^2$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle S_x^2 + S_y^2 + S_z^2$  
       
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\hbar^2 \over 4}\left[{\left(\matrix{0$  
       
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\hbar^2 \over 4}\left[{\left(\matrix{1$  
       
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\left(\matrix{{3 \over 4}\hbar^2$  

Note, however, that

\begin{displaymath}
s(s+1)\hbar^2 = {1 \over 2}\left({1 \over 2} + 1\right)\hbar^2 = {3 \over 4}\hbar^2
\end{displaymath}

Also, ${\left\vert{1 \over 2}\right>}$ and ${\left\vert-{1 \over 2}\right>}$ are eigenvectors of $S^2$, both with eigenvalues $3\hbar^2/4$. Finally, since

\begin{displaymath}
S^2 = {3 \over 4}\hbar^2{\left(\matrix{1 & 0 \cr 0 & 1}\right)}
\end{displaymath}

it is clear that $S^2$ commutes with $S_x$, $S_y$ and $S_z$ as expected for a Casimir operator.

Thus, the spin states are most generally denoted as

$\displaystyle \vert s\;m_s\rangle$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\left\vert{1 \over 2}\;\;\;{1 \over 2}\right>}= {\left(\matrix{1 \cr 0}\right)}$  
       
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\left\vert{1 \over 2}\;\;\;-{1 \over 2}\right>}= {\left(\matrix{0 \cr 1}\right)}$  

It is also possible to change from one spin state to another by means of the raising and lowering operators, which are defined by

$\displaystyle {\hbar\left(\matrix{0$ $\textstyle 1 \cr 0$ $\displaystyle 0{\right){$  
       
$\displaystyle {\hbar\left(\matrix{0$ $\textstyle 0 \cr 1$ $\displaystyle 0{\right){$  

which satisfy the following commutation rules:
$\displaystyle \left[S_+,S_-\right]$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle 2S_z$  
$\displaystyle \left[S_+,S_z\right]$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle -{\hbar \over 2}S_-$  
$\displaystyle \left[S_-,S_z\right]$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\hbar \over 2}S_+$  

and additionally:
$\displaystyle S^2$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {1 \over 2}\left(S_+S_- + S_- S_+\right) + S_z^2$  
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {1 \over 2}\left[S_+,S_-\right]_+ + S_z^2$  

where $\left[A,B\right]_+$ denotes the anticommutator between $A$ and $B$ defined to be $AB+BA$.

The action of the raising ($S_+$) and lowering ($S_-$) operators on the states can be worked out straightforwardly:

$\displaystyle S_+{\left\vert{1 \over 2}\;\;\;{1 \over 2}\right>}$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\hbar\left(\matrix{0$  
$\displaystyle S_+{\left\vert{1 \over 2}\;\;\;-{1 \over 2}\right>}$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\hbar\left(\matrix{0$  
$\displaystyle S_-{\left\vert{1 \over 2}\;\;\;-{1 \over 2}\right>}$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\hbar\left(\matrix{0$  
$\displaystyle S_-{\left\vert{1 \over 2}\;\;\;{1 \over 2}\right>}$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle {\hbar\left(\matrix{0$  

Generally, for spin-1/2,
$\displaystyle S_+\vert s\;m_s\rangle$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \hbar\vert s\;m_s+1\rangle$  
$\displaystyle S_-\vert s\;m_s\rangle$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \hbar\vert s\;m_s-1\rangle$  

It is customary to define the spin operators in terms of the so called Pauli matrices

\begin{displaymath}
\sigma_x = {\left(\matrix{0 & 1 \cr 1 & 0}\right)}\;\;\;\;\;...
...t)}\;\;\;\;\;\sigma_z={\left(\matrix{1 & 0 \cr 0 & -1}\right)}
\end{displaymath}

such that

\begin{displaymath}
{\bf S}= {\hbar \over 2}{\bf\sigma}
\end{displaymath}

The Pauli matrices satisfy the following properties
1.

\begin{displaymath}
{\left(\matrix{0 & 1 \cr 1 & 0}\right)}^2 = {\left(\matrix{0...
...ght)}^2 = {\left(\matrix{1 & 0 \cr 0 & -1}\right)}^2 = {\rm I}
\end{displaymath}



2.
Anticommutation:

\begin{displaymath}
\left[\sigma_i,\sigma_j\right]_+=0\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\rm for\;\;}i\neq j
\end{displaymath}



3.
Commutation:

\begin{displaymath}
{\bf\sigma}\times {\bf\sigma} = 2i{\bf\sigma}
\end{displaymath}



4.
Cyclic multiplication:

\begin{displaymath}
\sigma_x\sigma_y = i\sigma_z\;\;\;\;\;\sigma_y\sigma_z = i\sigma_x\;\;\;\;\;
\sigma_z\sigma_x = i\sigma_y
\end{displaymath}



5.
Tracelessness:

\begin{displaymath}
{\rm Tr}(\sigma_i) = 0
\end{displaymath}



6.
Determinant:

\begin{displaymath}
{\rm det}(\sigma_i) = -1
\end{displaymath}



7.
The Pauli matrices plus the identity matrix form a kind of ``basis'' in the space of all possible 2$\times$2 matrices. Thus, any 2$\times$2 matrix, ${\rm A}$ can be expressed as a linear combination of ${\bf\sigma}$ and $I$:

\begin{displaymath}
{\rm A} = \alpha_0 {\rm I} + \sum_{j=x,y,z}\alpha_j \sigma_j
\end{displaymath}

where $\alpha_0$, $\alpha_x$, $\alpha_y$ and can, in general, be complex numbers.

8.
Finally, for two arbitrary vectors and , the following identity can be proven:



next up previous
: この文書について... : lecture_5 : Amending the postulates of
Mark Tuckerman 平成17年2月18日