: Improvements on the approximation
: An example of the
: The trial wavefunction: a
We look, first, at the form of the orbitals that correspond to
the energies
, respectively. These can be
obtained by solving for the variational coefficients,
and
. These will be given by the matrix equation:
For example, using
, the following equations
for the coefficients are obtained:
which are not independent but are satisfied if
.
Similarly, for
, we obtain the two equations:
which are satisfied if
.
Thus, the two states corresponding to
are
The overall constants
are determined by requiring that
both be normalized. For
, for example,
we find
which requires that
Similarly, it can be shown that
Thus, the two states become
Notice that these are orthogonal:
Projecting onto a coordinate basis, we have
The state
, which corresponds to the energy
admits
a chemical bond and is, therefore, called a bonding state.
The state
, which corresponds to the energy
does not
admit a chemical bond and is, therefore, called an anti-bonding
state.
and
are examples of what
are called molecular orbitals. In this case, they are constructed
from linear combinations of atomic orbitals.
The functional form of the two molecular orbitals for H
within the current approximation scheme is
The contours of these functions are sketched below (the top plot
shows the two individual two atomic orbitals, while the middle and
bottom show the linear combinations
and
,
respectively):
Since
and
have the same value at the
origin and very similarly values near the origin, it is clear
that the electron probability density in this region will intensify
for
which is the sum of
and
.
This clearly corresponds to a chemical bonding situation. In contrast,
for
, which is the difference between
and
, there will be a deficit of electron density in
the region between the two protons, which is indicative of
a non-bonding situation.
: Improvements on the approximation
: An example of the
: The trial wavefunction: a
Mark Tuckerman
平成17年2月2日