Next: A word about time
Up: lecture_6
Previous: Predicting energy levels and
In this section, we will consider a very simple model that describes
an electron in a chemical bond. This is the so-called particle
in a box model. We imagine a particle strictly confined between two
``walls'' by a potential energy
that is shown in the figure below.
confines the particle to the region
. Such a model,
although simple, is physically reasonable. For example, imagine
an electron in a CC single bond. Since carbon atoms are roughly
24000 times more massive than an electron, thinking classically
for a moment, this would be like a ball-bearing between two
wrecking balls, which would certainly seem like two infinitely
high walls. The box length
for a CC single bond would
be roughly 1.5 Å.
Figure 1:
Illustration of a particle in a box
|
|
Mathematically, the potential energy is expressed as
If the potential is infinite outside the box, then there is zero
probability that the particle will be found there. Thus, we require
outside the box, and this can only happen if
at the boundaries
and
,
.
These, then, are the boundary conditions on
.
We will also require that the wavefunction be normalized to 1.
Since
outside the box, we only need to integrate
between 0 and
, so that
Since we already know that
outside the box, we only need
to solve the Schrödinger inside the box where
. In this case, the
Schrödinger looks like the free-particle equation we already wrote down
Rearranging gives
We have already seen that the solutions are sin or
cos functions. In fact, we can easily show that
the solution of this differential equation must
be either
where
and
are arbitrary constants.
But since we need
, the only solution that
is consistent with the boundary condition is the sin solution.
Thus, we take
It's a simple matter to verify that this function
satisfies the differential equation:
At this point, all we have is a general solution to the equation,
but we still do not know the allowed values of
. But, there
is also still one boundary condition we have not yet enforced.
We need
. This requires
In order to satisfy this, we can take any point where the
sin function vanishes. We know that
for
any value of
. Thus, our boundary condition is equivalent to
Solving this equation for
gives us the allowed energies:
Note, first, that there are many allowable values of
, so
we denote these by
according to the value of
that
we choose. For each allowable energy, there is also
a wavefunction
obtained by substituting
into the expression for
. This yields
We still need to determine the constant
, but before we
do this, a comment is in order. Specifically,
we are going to place a restriction
on
. We will restrict
to be the
natural numbers
. The value
gives
a wavefunction
that is everywhere 0, and
since the particle must be somewhere, this solution is
not allowed. In addition, although the negative numbers
also satisfy the boundary condition,
since
, because
, we do not need to keep the
negative values of
because an overall
minus sign on
does not change the
probability of finding the particle in a region
of the box becuase
.
Thus, those wavefunctions that give unique
probability densities are those for which
.
Let us now determine the constant
. There is still one piece
of information we have not used and that is the normalization
of
. For each
, this function must be
normalized to 1. This requires
Thus, each wavefunction takes the form
The figure below shows the energy level diagram together with
some of the wavefunctions and their associated probability
densities
:
Figure:
Energy level diagram, lowest order wavefunctions and
lowest order probability densities for the particle in a box.
|
|
That the
satisfy the Schrödinger equation can be expressed
compactly as
Let us now make a few important points that help us with a physical
interpretation of the functions
and energies
.
- 1.
- First what do we really mean when we refer to the
as the ``allowed'' energies? ``Allowed'' here means that
if we perform an experiment to measure the energy of the system,
the only possible outcome of such a measurement is one of the
. That is, the
are the only possible values we can
obtain in a measurement of the energy. Thus, we often refer
to the
as the eigenvalues of
,
eigen being the German word for ``own'' or ``characteristic''.
- 2.
- What do we mean by the ``allowed'' wave functions
? In general, the wave function of a particle
is not restricted to be one of the
. We can
prepare the particle in a state or with a wave function
that is different from
, however,
must be a combination of the allowed
,
and it must satisfy
,
, and
it must be normalized:
- 3.
- If we do prepare the system such that
for some
value of
, then a measurement of the energy will yield the value
with probability 1. For example, if
,
we would then obtain
with probability 1 if we were to measure the
energy. If
were a combination of more than one of the
,
then identical energy measurements will have different outcomes that cannot
be predicted. For example, if
, then a measurement of energy would yield
with
probability 1/2 and
with probability 1/2.
Several other things are worth noting before we proceed with this example.
First, as
increases, the number of nodes in the wave
function increases. A node is a point at which
the wavefunction cross the
-axis. For
,
has zero nodes, for
,
has one node, for
,
has two nodes, and in general,
has
nodes. Also note that
for all
, even though
can be either positive or negative.
This distinction will become particularly important
when we consider the quantum theory of chemical bonding.
Another important property of the allowed wave functions
is known as the orthogonality property. It is
straightforward to show that
Obviously, the integral must be 1 if
. To prove the
orthogonality property, one only needs to substitute the
form of
and
and do the integral.
Again, we will make use of this property when we consider
chemical bonding.
Finally, note that the lowest energy a particle can
have is not 0! The lowest energy corresponds to
This is true for any bound system in quantum mechanics.
This lowest energy is called the zero-point
energy of the system. This zero-point energy
is consistent with the uncertainty principle. Since
there is always energy in the system, it will never be
possible to obtain
and
under any circumstances.
Let us now proceed to work through an example that illustrates what
the wavefunctions mean.
Example: A particle in a one-dimensional box of length
has an energy
What is the probability that a measurement of the
location of the particle will find it between
and
?
From the given energy, the particle must be in the
state so that its wavefunction is
The probability that the particle will be found in the region
when its position is measured is then
Therefore, the probability is exactly
that the particle will
be found in the left half of the box.
It is important to note that if the particle is prepared
with one of the allowable wavefunctions
, then
a measurement of its energy will always yield the
same value
. Thus, since the energy has a well-defined
value, this value will be obtained in all independent
measurements in which the system is prepared the same way.
This is to be contrasted with a measurement of position,
which can yield any value between
and
with
varying probability. Moreover, preparing the system
in the same energy state and repeating the measurement
of position will yield different values in different
repetitions of the experiment. All we can determine
from the theory is the probability that the particle
will be found in a certain region.
Example: A particle of mass
in a box of length
is
prepared in a quantum state such that its wave function is
- a.
- Show that this state is correctly normalized.
- b.
- What is the probability that a measurement of the
particle's position will yield a value between
and
?
- c.
- What is the probability that a measurement of the
particle's energy yields a value
?
- a.
- The normalization condition requires that
Taking the square of the given wave function and integrating, we have
- b.
- The probability is given by
Substituting in gives
In order to calculate this, the following trig identities are useful:
Using these, the probability becomes
- c.
- Just as we cannot predict the outcome of a measurement of the
particle's position, we cannot predict the outcome of a measurement of
a particle's energy. We can, however, predict the probability for
obtaining any of the allowed energy values. Since these are the only
allowed values, such a measurement must yield one of these values can
cannot yield any other value. This is what is actually meant
by the term ``allowed'' for an arbitrary quantum state.
The formula that we need for predicting the probabilities of energy
measurements is the following: If
is the quantum state
of a system, the probability that a measurement of energy yields
the allowed value
is calculated using the corresponding
wave function
from
This is a general formula. For any other problem, the only
possible change is that the integration region
would be replaced by whatever the spatial domain of the problem is.
Despite how it looks, this formula is actually much easier to use
than the one for predicting the probabilities of position measurements,
thanks to the orthogonality property.
In order to anser the specific question, note that the energy
is actually the energy
, so the
question is really asking what is the probability that
a measurement of energy yields the value
. According to the
formula, this requires that we use the wave function
.
Substituting this and
into the formula yields
Now, the integral itself can be solved without integrating anything.
Note that because of orthogonality, the integral is just
Hence, squaring this result give the probability of 1/2 to
find obtain the result
. Note that this is just the
square of the coefficient of
in
.
From this result, it can be seen that the probability of
obtaining the result
is also
.
As a question for thought, what would be the probability
that a measurement of energy would yield the value
?
Next: A word about time
Up: lecture_6
Previous: Predicting energy levels and
Mark E. Tuckerman
2009-09-30