The ``aufbau'' concept applied to the MOs produced from LCAO follows the
same rules as for atoms. That is, we have to obey the Pauli exclusion
principle and apply Hund's rule. Thus, for the molecule H
, we have
two electrons: Each H
donates one in a 1s orbital to the LCAO
procedure. We already know that combining two 1s orbitals gives us
the
and
MOs, and since they are
different in energy, we do not need to worry about Hund's rule. We simply
place both electrons (in opposite spin configurations) into the
orbital as the correlation diagram below illustrates:
For the helium dimer He
, there are four electrons, each He atom
contributing 2 electrons in 1s orbitals. When placing these electrons
into the
and
MOs, we are forced to
place two electrons into each, which means two electrons in the
bonding orbital and two in the antibonding orbital. LCAO predicts
that two electrons in an antibonding orbital generates as much
destabilization of the bond as there is stabilization from the
two bonding electrons. Thus, LCAO would predict that He
cannot form a stable bond. In fact, a very weak bond stabilization
of roughly 10
Ry exists between to helium atoms, resulting
in a very weak He
dimer. Of course, LCAO cannot predict this.
Nevertheless, LCAO gives us an easy way to estimate the stability
of a chemical bond which is qualitatively reasonable (even if it
misses exotic objects like the weak He
dimer). Within LCAO,
we can define a bond order
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
The electronic configurations of H
, H
and He
are written in
an manner analogous to the atomic case:
At this point, we state the general rules for constructing MOs from AOs in the LCAO procedure: