Computer
Science Department
Courant
Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Session 14: Class Project
Assessment Form
Course Title: Application Servers
Course Number: g22.3033-006
Instructor: Jean-Claude Franchitti
Session Date: 12/03/03
Project #: ___ Team Member(s): ____________________________________________
Review
Items |
Project Assessment Focus |
|
Actual
Score |
1 |
Demonstration of two or more application
services on top of three or more application server platforms. Application
server platforms must include both a CORBA and an RMI-based platform. |
2 |
|
2 |
Brief summary of the application services |
1 |
|
3 |
One bonus point for any additional
working application services. Any
working demonstrations involving the J2EE, Web Services, and/or CORBA 3
platforms will automatically be granted this bonus
point. |
(1) |
|
4 |
Application service(s) must be based on the
MOO framework |
1 |
|
5 |
One bonus point for prepared test case |
1 |
|
6 |
Project is an integrated version of hw# 1-8 |
1 |
|
7 |
Application service is portable across various
application server platforms, or is integrated to operate on top of multiple
application server platforms |
1 |
|
8 |
Application service operates on top of
well-understood infrastructure. Benefits and deficiencies of the various underlying
application server technologies involved are well understood. Performance
issues and other enterprise assurance features are accounted as needed |
1 |
|
9 |
Unless otherwise agreed on a case-by-case basis,
the application infrastructure must be the 2D-chat environment. The
environment can be either one of the platforms suggested/provided for the
homework assignments, a new platform, or a third-party 2D chat environment |
2 |
|
10 |
One bonus point for web-enabled 2D chat
capabilities |
(1) |
|
11 |
Explanation of the development tools used
to implement and test the application service(s) on top of their respective
application server platforms. |
1 |
|
12 |
Explanation of the underlying application
server technologies used by the application service(s) at
run-time |
1 |
|
13 |
Clearly stated limitations and bugs |
1 |
|
14 |
Well packaged application service |
1 |
|
15 |
Suitable project report provided no later
than |
6 |
|
16 |
Anything particularly creative |
(1) |
|
Total |
|
20+(3) |
|