15 April 2010
rev 3/23/11
Sex and Gender: Analytical
Foundations
G93.2227
Spring 2010
http://www.nyu.edu/classes/jackson/analysis.of.sex.and.gender
Robert Max Jackson
- a working reading list and syllabus -
Description:
This
"page" serves to provide both an extended reading list on gender
inequality and the syllabus for a graduate course based on the core of
this extended reading list. The readings are almost all articles
(with important books represented by the related scholarly articles)
and the list includes direct links to online versions of most of those
articles. These links are aimed at NYU's access and will not be
successful for anyone not affiliated with NYU--however, most of the
links have the generic, non-NYU link embedded in them which can be
extracted for use elsewhere.
This course will allow the student to
understand theoretical developments in the area of gender studies, and
it will promote the development of general skills in theoretical
criticism and social analysis. In general, this course will concentrate
on explaining inequality between women and men: how does it arise, why
does it take different forms, why does it vary in degree across
societies, what are the components that add up to gender inequality,
how do various institutions and practices contribute to it, and how
does it change? The course will emphasize the history of gender
inequality in the United States.
Readings & Books for the
Class:
Most of our readings will be articles available for
download. The links will appear in the on-line version of
the course syllabus. Excerpts from Down So Long ...: The
Puzzling Persistence of Gender Inequality (book manuscript by RMJ
not yet published) will similarly be available by download from the
class web site. We will read selections from Jackson's book Destined
for Equality (Harvard U Press) throughout the course, so it would
be wise to buy it or borrow it. Any student who does not have any
background in gender studies, particularly sociological, is likely to
benefit from reading through a standard textbook in the area--I
recommend Michael Kimmel's Gendered Society (which I use in
undergraduate classes).
Most sections of the syllabus include--beside the common
readings--subsections for an analytical task, recommended
readings, and related readings.
To simplify navigating through the syllabus, the items in these
subsections are hidden until the viewer clicks on the subsection
heading, then they will appear.
Course Outline and Readings
I. Introduction. What
do we mean by gender inequality?
How can we conceive of and talk
about gender inequality in ways that are general enough to apply across
the range of relevant phenomena, consistent enough to minimize
conceptual ambiguities, and precise enough to be analytically
effective? Gender inequality has been extraordinarily diverse and
wide spread. Women and men are unequal in every conceivable way
in endless circumstances, both immediate and enduring, by both
objective criteria and subjective experience. So, what counts as
gender inequality? Can we characterize it in ways that let us
confidently and impartially assess when there is more or less of it?
- Analytical
Task
- How can we make gender inequality both conceptually meaningful and empirically well specified?
- Conceptual problem:
- Make a list of every way that women and men can be socially
unequal as a consequence of their membership in a gender
category.
- Consider opportunities, resources, experiences, culture, and ideology among other things.
- Once the list is made, try to explain how we might
meaningfully conceive overall gender inequality as a composite of all
these facets.
- Empirical problem:
- For each aspect of gender inequality listed as a conceptual
component, try to provide some method by which we can measure it.
This may be precise as in a gini coefficient for occupational
segregation or it may be an effort at cruder but important distinctions
between low, medium, and high inequality for forms of inequality that
elude clear, numerical assessment.
- Once the varied possible measures have been suggested,
consider how one might meaningfully combine them to achieve a means of
assessing the relative amount of gender inequality in a society.
- Common Readings
- Destined for Equality: Egalitarian Impulse
- Down So Long: Why Is
It So Hard to Explain Gender Inequality?
- Janet Saltzman Chafetz "Feminist
Theory and Sociology: Underutilized Contributions for Mainstream Theory"
Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 23, (1997), pp.
97-120; or Janet Saltzman Chafetz "The
Varieties of Gender Theory in Sociology" Handbook of the
Sociology of Gender, 1999, p3-23, 21
- Rachel A. Rosenfeld. "What
Do We Learn about Difference from the Scholarship on Gender?" Social
Forces, Vol. 81, No. 1 (Sep., 2002), pp. 1-24
- Recommended
Readings
- World Economic Forum. "The Global Gender Gap Report 2010"
- Klasen, Stephan and Schüler, Dana. "Reforming the Gender-Related Development Index and the Gender Empowerment Measure: Implementing Some Specific Proposals." Feminist Economics, 2011, 17:1, 1-30
- Beneria, L. and Permanyer, I. "The Measurement of Socio-economic Gender Inequality Revisited." Development and Change, 2010, 41: 375–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01648.x
- Iñaki Permanyer. "The Measurement of Multidimensional Gender Inequality: Continuing the Debate." Social Indicators Research, 2010, 95: 2, 181 - 198. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-009-9463-4
- ...
- Related
Readings
- Dijkstra, A. G. "Revisiting UNDP’s GDI and GEM: Towards an alternative." Social Indicators
Research, 2002, 57, 301–338. doi:10.1023/A:1014726207604.
- Dijkstra, A. Geske and Hanmer, Lucia C. "Measuring Socio-Economic GENDER Inequality: Toward an Alternative to the UNDP Gender-Related Development Index." Feminist Economics, 2000, 6:2, 41-75.
- Francisco Javier Blancas Peral, Mónica Domínguez Serrano, and Flor Ma Guerrero Casas. "An
alternative approach to measuring gender inequality." Journal of Gender Studies, 2008, 17:4, 369-374.
II. How is gender inequality
symbolized and reproduced in everyday life?
- Analytical
Task
-
- Begin with the experience--how do people act out gender
inequality?
- Select two kinds of interactions that typically involve both
women and men, but sometimes only men and sometimes only women.
If possible, include examples both where people are likely to be aware
of their unequal positions in the interaction and where they are not.
- Describe how the interaction circumstances are likely to look
and feel differently by gender. Consider both cross-sex and
same-sex interactions.
- Consider what happens when normative expectations are
disrupted because, first, someone pursues the behaviors associated with
the other gender and, second, circumstances obstruct the capacity of
both sexes to conform to gender expectations.
- Assess what are the conditions or processes that sustain
gender differentials.
- Common Readings:
-
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Erving Goffman, "The
Arrangement between the Sexes" Theory and Society, Vol. 4,
No. 3 (Autumn, 1977), pp. 301-331
- Deniz Kandiyoti, "Bargaining
with Patriarchy." Gender and Society," Vol. 2, No. 3 (Sep.,
1988), pp. 274-290
- Related
Readings
- Cecilia Ridgeway. Framed by Gender. Oxford: 2011.
- ...
III. Why have women
apparently occupied a subordinate position in all societies?
- Analytical
Task
-
- Although scholars disagree if women have ever held a fully
equal or better status in any society, all agree that men have been
dominant in most societies although the degree of dominance varies
greatly. This raises the very tricky question, how do we explain
the prevalence of male dominance? This exceedingly elusive
question continues to elude any answer that will evoke a
consensus. Any answer, however, must consider the possible role
of biology, and that will be the focus of our task.
- Select one relatively absolute biological difference between
males and females and one distributional difference (i.e., differences
in the average characteristics of males and females, such as voice
pitch).
- For each selected difference, try to identify how it might be
possible for that difference to lead to gender inequality with high
probability. Thus, you are trying to establish a process that
would be likely to lead from relative gender equality to
inequality.
- Try also to specify under what social conditions or as a
result of what processes the inequality might not come about.
- Common Readings
-
- Joan N. Huber. "Reproductive
Biology, Technology, and Gender Inequality: An Autobiographical Essay"
Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 34 (2008) : 1-13
- Randall Collins, Janet Saltzman Chafetz, Rae Lesser Blumberg,
Scott Coltrane, Jonathan H. Turner
Toward an Integrated Theory of Gender Stratification Sociological
Perspectives, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), pp. 185-216
- Down So Long: Analyzing the
Persistence of Gender Inequality: How to Think about the Origins
- Sharon Smith. "Engels
and the Origin of Women's Oppression" International
Socialist Review Issue 2, Fall 1997
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Related
Readings
-
- Rae Blumberg. "Extending
Lenski's Schema to Hold Up Both Halves of the Sky—A Theory‐Guided Way
of Conceptualizing Agrarian Societies that Illuminates a Puzzle about
Gender Stratification" Sociological Theory 22:2 (June
2004):278-291
- Janet Saltzman Chafetz "Gendered Power and
Privilege: Taking Lenski One Step Further" Sociological
Theory, Vol. 22, No. 2, Religion, Stratification, and Evolution in
Human Societies: Essays in Honor of Gerhard E. Lenski (Jun., 2004), pp.
269-277
- Joan N. Huber. "Comparative
Gender Stratification." Handbook of the Sociology of Gender,
1999, p65-80
- Maurice Godelier, "The
Origins of Male Domination" New Left Review, May-June 1981,
pp. 3-17
- William Tulio Divale, Marvin Harris. "Population,
Warfare, and the Male Supremacist Complex." American
Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 78, No. 3 (Sep., 1976), pp.
521-538 [See also: William Divale, Marvin Harris, Donald T. Williams. "On
the Misuse of Statistics: A Reply to Hirschfeld et al."
American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 80, No. 2 (Jun., 1978), pp.
379-386; William Divale, Marvin Harris. "The
Male Supremacist Complex: Discovery of a Cultural Invention"
American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 80, No. 3 (Sep., 1978), pp.
668-671]
- C C Mukhopadhyay, and P J Higgins. "Anthropological
Studies of Women's Status Revisited: 1977-1987". Annual Review
of Anthropology Vol. 17 (1988): 461-495
- Naomi Quinn. "Anthropological
Studies on Women's Status". Annual Review of Anthropology
Vol. 6 (1977): 181-225
- Chris Hann. "Reproduction
and Inheritance: Goody Revisited." Annual Review of Anthropology,
Vol. 37 (2008): 145-158
IV. What determines men's
and women's roles and positions within families?
Family and kinship are potentially relevant to
gender inequality in varied ways and a lot of work had pursued such
issues. Probably the two most important general issues involve
the ways that women and men are unequal within families and the ways
that family organization both contributes to and is influenced by
gender inequality beyond the family institution. We will just
touch the surface of these issues this week.
- Analytical
Task
-
- One of the key issues surrounding analyses of gender and
families concerns a distinction between two kinds of causes. The
first kind are the limitations of the larger social environment, in
terms of the opportunities, responsibilities, and obstructions facing
women and men. The second are the ways that women and men make
choices. As a first look at these issues, let us try to examine
the possibilites using very simple models.
- Assume that all men have opportunities for decent jobs and
wish to have them.
- Assume there are two possible conditions concerning the
economic opportunities for women: either decent jobs are available for
one-third of women or for two-thirds.
- Assume that the distribution of women's preferences could be
at either of two levels: either two-thirds prefer to hold a decent,
full time job (the other third prefering to remain at home) or
one-third prefer a decent full time job (the other two-thirds prefering
to remain at home).
- Assume that the preferences of men are distributed at one of
two levels: either two-thirds prefer wives who work full time (the
other third preferring stay-at-home wives) or one-third prefer wives
who work full time (and two-thirds prefer wives staying at home).
- Assume that people's preferences influence both what kind of
people they try to marry and what they do after marrying.
- Given these assumptions, consider what the social outcomes
might be under the varied possibilities defined by the distribution of
women's opportunities, the distribution of women's preferences, and the
distribution of men's preferences. The idea is to think through
all the possible combinations of these conditions. What are the
types of marriages that can result, what proportion of families will be
of each type, what proportion will have a working wife, what proportion
will have two people content with their circumstances, and so forth?
- To extend the analysis, you can add other possible
variations. These might include variations in the distribution of
men's work preferences, the cross-cutting influence of class, widening
the range of possible conditions (e.g. what if no women or all women
wanted to hold jobs) or the like.
- Common Readings
-
- Andrew J. Cherlin,
American Marriage in the Early Twenty-First Century The Future
of Children Volume 15, Number 2, Fall 2005
- Destined for Equality: Institutional
Individualism: "Individualistic Family" 157-169
- Stephanie Coontz. “The
Historical Transformation of Marriage,” Journal of Marriage and
Family, Volume 66, Issue 4 (p 974-979) November 2004.
- Down So Long: Intimate Combat: The
Responsibility for Child Rearing
- Coltrane, Scott. 1989. “Household
Labor and the Routine Production of Gender.” Social Problems
36: 473-490.
- Brines, Julie. 1994. “Economic
Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home.” American
Journal of Sociology 100(3): 652-689.
- Kathleen Gerson. "Changing
Lives, Resistant Institutions: A New Generation Negotiates Gender,
Work, and Family Change" Sociological Forum, Vol. 24,
No. 4, December 2009
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Beth Anne Shelton, Daphne John. "The
Division of Household Labor." Annual Review of Sociology,
Vol. 22, (1996), pp. 299-322
- Kathleen Gerson. "Moral
Dilemmas, Moral Strategies, and the Transformation of Gender: Lessons
from Two Generations of Work and Family Change" Gender &
Society. Vol. 16 No. 1, February 2002 8-28
- Andrew J. Cherlin, "The
Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage" Journal of
Marriage and Family, Volume 66, Issue 4 (p 848-861) November
2004.
- William J. Goode. "The
Theoretical Importance of Love" American Sociological
Review, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Feb., 1959), pp. 38-47
- Sara B. Raley, Marybeth J. Mattingly, Suzanne M. Bianchi. "How
Dual Are Dual-Income Couples? Documenting Change From 1970 to 2001.
Journal of Marriage and Family 68:1 (2006), 11-28
- Veronica Tichenor. "Maintaining
Men's Dominance: Negotiating Identity and Power When She Earns More."
Sex Roles 53:3-4, (2005): 191-205
- Related
Readings
-
- Davis, S. N., T. Greenstein and J. G. Marks, “Effects
of Union Type and Division of Household Labor,” Journal of
Family Issues 28 (2007):1247–72.
- Scott Coltrane.
Father-Child Relationships and the Status of Women: A
Cross-Cultural Study. American Journal of Sociology, 93 (1988):
1060-1095. - Joann Vanek. "Time Spent in Housework." Scientific
American 231 (Nov 1974):116-120.
- Valerie Kincade Oppenheimer. "The
Sociology of Women's Economic Role in the Family." American
Sociological Review, Vol. 42, No. 3 (Jun., 1977), pp. 387-406
- Kathleen Gerson. (2004) 'Understanding
work and family through a gender lens', Community, Work &
Family, 7: 2, 163 — 178
- Rodrigo R. Soares, Bruno L. S. Falcão. "The
Demographic Transition and the Sexual Division of Labor." The
Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 116, No. 6 (Dec., 2008), pp.
1058-1104
- Pennington, Suzanne(2009) 'Bisexuals
“Doing Gender” in Romantic Relationships', Journal of
Bisexuality, 9:1, 33-69
- Becker, G. S., “Human
Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor,” Journal of
Labor Economics 3(1) (1985):33–58.
V. What is the role of
sexuality?
Sexuality has been evoked in multiple ways in the
study of gender inequality. It may be considered as a possible
motivating cause for inequality, examined for the ways it reflects or
is effected by gender inequality, or incorporated as a peculiar tension
between women and men that mediates both the causes and effects of
gender inequality. Essentially everyone recognizes sexuality as
critically important to gender inequality, but it eludes comprehensive
analysis.
- Analytical
Task
-
- Select two distinctive social contexts in which gender
inequality has a consequential presence (e.g., American Appalachian
families, bowling leagues, investment banks); try to use one context
that is relatively formal and another that is relative informal
- For each social context, try to describe how female and male
participants express and experience sexuality differently,
- for each context, consider any ways that sexual rules and
standards appear to differ by gender
- Try to identify the principle causes that would appear to
explain the sexual rules and standards of conduct in each
setting. Consider why there are any rules or standards about
sexuality. Consider why how the rules and practices might reflect
gender inequality and how they might reinforce it.
- Common Readings
-
- John D. DeLamater and Janet Shibley Hyde. "Essentialism
vs. Social Constructionism in the Study of Human Sexuality." The
Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, The Use of Theory in
Research and
Scholarship on Sexuality (1998), pp. 10-18
- Joan Acker. "Hierarchies,
Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations" Gender
& Society 1990 4: 139-158.
- Down So Long: Intimate Combat: Sexuality
and Gender Inequality
- Bem, D. J. (2000). Exotic
Becomes Erotic: Interpreting the biological correlates of sexual
orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 531-548.
- Catharine A. MacKinnon. ""Feminism,
Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory." Signs,
Vol. 7, No. 3, Feminist Theory (Spring, 1982), pp. 515-544
- Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). "'His'
And 'Her' Relationships: A Review Of The Empirical Evidence."
In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of
Personal Relationships (pp. 884-904). New York: Cambridge
University Press
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Letitia Anne Peplau. "Human
Sexuality: How Do Men and Women Differ?" Current
Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Apr., 2003),
pp. 37-40
- David L. Weis. "The
Use of Theory in Sexuality Research". The Journal of Sex
Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, The Use of Theory in Research and
Scholarship on Sexuality (1998), pp. 1-9
- Crawford, M., et. al.,
Sexual Double Standards: A Review and Methodological Critique of Two
Decades of Research. The Journal of Sex Research v. 40 no. 1
(February 2003) p. 13-26
- Carl N. Degler. "What
Ought To Be and What Was: Women's Sexuality in the Nineteenth Century."
The American Historical Review, Vol. 79, No. 5 (Dec.,
1974), pp. 1467-1490
- Dennis D. Waskul, Phillip Vannini, Desiree Wiesen. "Women
and Their Clitoris: Personal Discovery, Signification, and Use."
Symbolic Interaction May 2007, Vol. 30, No. 2: 151–174
- Breanne Fahs. "Compulsory
Bisexuality?: The Challenges of Modern Sexual Fluidity."
Journal of Bisexuality, Volume 9, Issue 3 & 4
July 2009 , pages 431-449
- John A. Miller, Joan Acker, Kate Barry, Miriam M. Johnson and
Lois A. West. "Comments
on MacKinnon's 'Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State'."
Signs, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Autumn, 1984), pp. 168-184;
and Catharine A. MacKinnon, "Reply
to Miller, Acker and Barry, Johnson, West, and Gardiner."
Signs, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Autumn, 1984), pp. 184-188 - Steven Epstein. "An
Incitement to Discourse: Sociology and the History of Sexuality."
Sociological Forum, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Sep., 2003), pp.
485-502
- Related
Readings
- Zaylía, Jessica Leigh(2009) 'Toward
a Newer Theory of Sexuality: Terms, Titles, and the Bitter Taste of
Bisexuality', Journal of Bisexuality, 9: 2, 109 - 123
- Nicole Constable. "The
Commodification of Intimacy: Marriage, Sex, and Reproductive Labor."
Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 38: 49-64 (2009)
- Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003).
Sexual Compliance: Gender, Motivational, And Relationship Perspectives.
Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87-100
- Ronald Weitzer. "Sociology
of Sex Work." Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 35:
213-234 (2009)
- Pennington, Suzanne(2009) 'Bisexuals
"Doing Gender" in Romantic Relationships', Journal of Bisexuality,
9: 1, 33-69
- Lisa Duggan "From
Instincts to Politics: Writing the History of Sexuality in the U.S."
The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, Feminist
Perspectives on Sexuality. Part 1 (Feb., 1990), pp. 95-109
- Michael W. Wiederman. "The
Truth Must Be in Here Somewhere: Examining the Gender Discrepancy in
Self-Reported Lifetime Number of Sex Partners." The Journal of Sex
Research, Vol. 34, No. 4 (1997), pp. 375-386
- Norman R. Brown, Robert C. Sinclair. "Estimating
Number of Lifetime Sexual Partners: Men and Women Do It Differently."
The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Aug., 1999), pp. 292-297
- John Levi Martin, Matt George. "Theories
of Sexual Stratification: Toward an Analytics of the Sexual Field and a
Theory of Sexual Capital." Sociological Theory, Vol. 24, No. 2
(Jun., 2006), pp. 107-132
- Judith Treas, Deirdre Giesen. "Sexual
Infidelity among Married and Cohabiting Americans." Journal of
Marriage and the Family, Vol. 62, No. 1 (Feb., 2000), pp. 48-60
- Blow, Adrian J.; Hartnett, Kelley. "Infidelity
In Committed Relationships II: A Substantive Review ." Journal of
Marital and Family Therapy, Volume 31, Issue 2, 2005, First Page 217
- Lever, J., Frederick, D., & Peplau, L. A. (2006).
Does Size Matter? Men's And Women's Views On Penis Size Across The Life
Span. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 7(3), 129-143
VI. What is the role of
sex differences in the functioning and perpetuation of gender
inequality?
Attempts to explain gender inequality at all levels
are haunted by essentialism. Even as they expressly
reject the possibility of consequential inherent differences between
women and men, theoretical analyses of gender inequality habitually
build on gender differences. For some, essentialism always means
a difference based in biology or genetics; for others it includes
cultural differences that are embodied in women and men.
- Analytical
Task
-
- Select two forms or facets of gender inequality that are
sufficiently important, widespread, and enduring or recurring to merit
thoughtful theory and explanation. E.g., the facet might be that
wives commonly defer to husbands.
- For each of these types or aspects of gender inequality,
attempt to devise the best possible explanation you can from each of
the following perspectives. These should be succinct but clear.:
-
- Direct biological - devise an explanation
claiming some biological difference between the sexes produces the
inequality by making women and men act differently. E.g., an
argument might be that men are stronger than women so men dominate
women as a simple result of superior strength.
- Indirect biological - formulate an explanation
claiming some biological difference does not directly produce
the inequality, but it has effects or implications of some sort, and
those effects that make likely or unavoidable the emergence or
persistence of the selected aspect of gender inequality. E.g.,
someone might argue that women's child bearing makes them anxious about
the welfare of their children, and that anxiety makes them feel weak
and in want of a protector, leading them to defer to husbands.
Or, women's child rearing orientation causes women and men to make men
responsible for warfare, that men therefore become trained for combat,
and that men's resulting skill at combat plus possession of weapons
leaves wives typically in their husbands' control. The key here
is that the relevant biological differences do not directly cause the
gender inequality being explained.
- Nonbiological sex difference (neither biological
nor a direct result of biological differences) initiates or preserves
the selected aspect of gender inequality. E.g., one might argue
that wives' limited opportunities for jobs makes them dependent on
husbands, and this dependency gives husbands power. Or, one might
claim that women are fearful and dependent because of socialization
processes (that have no biological basis), and this psychological
condition induces wives to defer to their husbands.
- An imputed sex difference that does not really exist
plays a significant role in producing the selected facet of gender
inequality. E.g., one might suggest that although women have no
better capacity for child rearing, people commonly assume they do
because women bear children, and that this false expectation produces a
division of labor and power favoring men.
- A causal process that does not involve any difference
between the sexes produces the inequality being considered.
E.g., some might argue that for families to fulfill their social
functions effectively, they need one spouse/parent to perform the
critical emotional actions needed and the other spouse/parent to
perform the practical and leadership actions. This role
differentiation typically results in spouse inequality, although that
is an indirect and unintended consequence.
- (Note that the aim is to offer what those advocating each
of the above types of explanation would think is a good answer.
It is often hardest to conceive good explanations from the points of
view we find unconvincing or unappealing, but the capacity to do this
is a valuable skill.)
- Try to formulate how research could provide decisive evidence
about which of the suggested forms of explanation is most valid or
important. Thus, after defining the five possible explanations,
seriously consider how we could try to show which one(s) is
better. Better not in the sense that we would prefer it to be
true, but rather that evidence and theoretical assessment show it
better regardless how we feel about it.
- Common Readings
-
- Carol Gilligan. "Hearing
the Difference: Theorizing Connection." Hypatia, Vol.
10, No. 2 (Spring, 1995), pp. 120-127
- Carol Gilligan. "Reply
by Carol Gilligan." Signs, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Winter, 1986),
pp. 324-333
- Jaffee, Sara; Hyde, Janet Shibley. "Gender
Differences In Moral Orientation: A Meta-Analysis." Psychological
Bulletin. Vol 126(5), Sep 2000, 703-726. [HTML
version]
- Valian, Virginia. 1998a. "Sex,
Schemas, and Success: What's Keeping Women Back?" Academe 84(5):
50-55. (Compare Ridgeway in Section II above.) (See Valian in
Optional Readings for fuller account.)
- Uri Gneezy, Kenneth L. Leonard, And John A. List. "Gender
Differences in Competition: Evidence From a Matrilineal and a
Patriarchal Society." Econometrica, Vol. 77, No. 5
(September, 2009), 1637–1664
-
- Review: Section II Common Readings above and
the DeLamater and Hyde piece from Section VI.
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Douglas Schrock, Michael Schwalbe. "Men,
Masculinity, and Manhood Acts." Annual Review of Sociology,
Vol. 35: 277-295 (August 2009).
- Janis S. Bohan. "Regarding
gender: Essentialism, Constructionism, and Feminist Psychology." Psychology
of Women Quarterly, Mar 93, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p5, 17p
- Rosemary L. Hopcroft. "Gender
Inequality in Interaction – An Evolutionary Account." Social
Forces, Volume 87, Number 4, June 2009, pp. 1845-1871
- Matthew H. McIntyre, Carolyn Pope Edwards. "The
Early Development of Gender Differences." Annual Review
of Anthropology, Vol. 38: 83-97 (October 2009)
- Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A
Cross-Cultural Analysis Of The Behavior Of Women And Men: Implications
For The Origins Of Sex Differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128,
699-727. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699
- Nancy Chodorow. "Oedipal
Asymmetries and Heterosexual Knots." Social Problems, Vol.
23, No. 4, Feminist Perspectives: The Sociological Challenge (Apr.,
1976), pp. 454-468
- Related
Readings
-
- Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The
Origins Of Sex Differences In Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions
Versus Social Roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423. doi:
10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
- Valian, V. (1999).
The Cognitive Bases Of Gender Bias. Brooklyn Law Review, 65,
1037-1061.
- Clopton, Nancy A.; Sorell, Gwendolyn T. "Gender
differences in moral reasoning." . Psychology of Women Quarterly,
Mar93, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p85
- Pamela L. Geller. "Identity
and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology." Annual
Review of Anthropology, Vol. 38: 65-81 (October 2009)
- Barbara J. Risman, “Intimate
Relationships from a Microstructural Perspective: Mothering Men.”
Gender and Society 1:1 (March 1987).
- Nancy Chodorow. "Mothering,
Object-Relations, and the Female Oedipal Configuration." Feminist
Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1 (Feb., 1978), pp. 137-158
- Timothy J. Biblarz & Judith Stacey. "How
Does the Gender of Parents Matter?" Journal of Marriage and Family
72:1 (2010):3-22
- Adrienne Rich. 1980. “Compulsory
Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence.” Signs: Journal of Women
in Culture and Society 5 (4): 631-660
- Judith Butler. "Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory." Theatre Journal, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Dec., 1988), pp. 519-531.
- Nussbaum, M. C.
The Professor Of Parody [J. Butler]. The New Republic v. 220 no. 8
(February 22 1999) p. 37-45. {Also, Nussbaum, M. C.
Martha C. Nussbaum And Her Critics: An Exchange [discussion of
February 22, 1999 article, The Professor Of Parody]. The New Republic
v. 220 no. 16 (April 19 1999) p. 43-5}
- Timothy V. Kaufman-Osborn. "Fashionable Subjects: On
Judith Butler and the Causal Idioms of Postmodern Feminist Theory."
Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Sep.,
1997), pp. 649-674
- Veronica Vasterling. "Butler's Sophisticated
Constructivism: A Critical Assessment." Hypatia, Vol.
14, No. 3 (Summer, 1999), pp. 17-38
- Barbara F. Reskin. "Including
Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality." American
Sociological Review, Vol. 68, No. 1 (Feb., 2003), pp. 1-21
VII. What is the role of
violence and intimidation in the relationships between men and
women?
Most theoretical approaches to gender inequality
suggest that violence between women and men plays a role in sustaining
inequality; some also point toward violence as an initial
cause. A recurring issue concerns the degree to which violence is
an expression or result of gender inequality or, alternatively, is a
cause of inequality. The separate roles of rape, harassment, and
domestic violence, and their relationships to each other are another
critical question. Much research and argument has also been
focused on the question of women's aggressive impulses and
actions.
- Analytical
Task
-
- Select one important form of violence or threat of violence
between women and men.
- Clarify the important variations in the concrete
manifestations of this violence; assess when, where, and how often it
occurs; and try to specify why it is important.
- Describe two or more distinct and plausible explanations of
this violence (plausible to some reputable scholars; not limited to
explanations that you find plausible).
- Offer a research design that can plausibly test which of the
competing explanations is more valid and effective. Be clear how
and why the competing explanations would lead to different expectations
and show how the resulting evidence could support each of the
explanations if it were correct.
- Common Readings
-
- Claudia Garcia-Moreno, Lori Heise, Henrica A. F. M. Jansen,
Mary Ellsberg and Charlotte Watts. "Violence
against Women." Science, New Series, Vol. 310, No. 5752 (Nov.
25, 2005), pp. 1282-1283 [data brief]
- David M. Fergusson, L. John Horwood, Elizabeth M. Ridder. "Partner
Violence and Mental Health Outcomes in a New Zealand Birth Cohort."
Journal of Marriage and Family, Volume 67, Issue 5 (p 1103-1119)
-
- the above article was published with the following two
commentaries and rejoinder by the authors--these clarify the points of
disagreement
- Michael P. Johnson. "Domestic
Violence: It's Not about Gender: Or Is It?." Journal of Marriage
and Family, Vol. 67, No. 5 (Dec., 2005), pp. 1126-1130
- Amy Holtzworth-Munroe. "Male
Versus Female Intimate Partner Violence: Putting Controversial Findings
Into Context." Journal of Marriage and Family, Volume 67, Issue 5
(p 1120-1125)
- David M. Fergusson, L. John Horwood, Elizabeth M. Ridder.
"Rejoinder."
Journal of Marriage and Family, Volume 67, Issue 5 (p 1131-1136)
- Jocelyn A. Hollander. "Vulnerability
and Dangerousness: The Construction of Gender through Conversation
about Violence." Gender & Society 2001; 15; 83
- Down So Long: Intimate Combat: Violence
and Intimidation
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Archer, J. (2002).
Sex Differences In Physically Aggressive Acts Between Heterosexual
Partners: A Metaanalytic Review. Aggression & Violent Behavior,
7, 313–351.
- Saguy, Abigail C. “Employment
Discrimination or Sexual Violence?: Defining
Sexual Harassment in American and French Law.” Law & Society
Review. 34:4 (2000):1091-1128. also see Saguy, Abigail C. “What
is Sexual Harassment? From Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne,” Thomas
Jefferson Law Review, 27:45, (2005):45-56.
- Manuel Eisner. "Long-Term Historical Trends in Violent Crime. " Crime and Justice, Vol. 30, (2003), pp. 83-142
- Malcolm M. Feeley, Deborah L. Little. "The Vanishing Female: The Decline of Women in the Criminal Process, 1687-1912." Law & Society Review, Vol. 25, No. 4 (1991), pp. 719-758
- Quinn, Beth A. "Sexual
Harassment and Masculinity: The Power and Meaning of 'Girl Watching.'"
Gender & Society, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 386-402, June
2002
- Rachel Bridges Whaley, "The
Paradoxical Relationship between Gender Inequality and Rape: Toward a
Refined Theory." Gender & Society, vol. 15, no. 4, pp.
531-555, Aug 2001
- Review Robert Sapolsky, "Testosterone
Rules" from section III above.
- Murray A. Straus. 2007. "Dominance
and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students
in 32 nations." Children and Youth Services Review 30:252-275.
- Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A
cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications
for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128,
699-727. [note: also recommended for previous section]
- Sarah K. Murnen, Carrie Wright, and Gretchen Kaluzny. "If
'Boys Will Be Boys,' Then Girls Will Be Victims? A Meta-Analytic Review
of the Research That Relates Masculine Ideology to Sexual Aggression."
Sex Roles
Volume 46, Numbers 11-12 / June, 2002 - Peggy Reeves Sanday. "Rape-Prone
Versus Rape-Free Campus Cultures." Violence Against Women, Vol. 2,
No. 2, 191-208 (1996)
- Related
Readings
- Linda Gordon. "Family
Violence, Feminism, and Social Control." Feminist Studies, Vol. 12,
No. 3 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 453-478
- Christopher Uggen & Amy Blackstone. "Sexual
Harrasment as a Gendered Expression of Power." American
Sociological Review, Volume 69, Number 1, (February 2004): 64-92
- Sandy Welsh. "Gender
And Sexual Harassment." Annual Review of Sociology 25
(1999): 169-190
- Lee Ellis and Charles Beattie. "The
Feminist Explanation for Rape: An Empirical Test." The Journal
of Sex Research, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Feb., 1983), pp. 74-93
- Kimberly Martin, Lynne M. Vieraitis and Sarah Britto. "Gender
Equality and Women’s Absolute Status: A Test of the Feminist Models of
Rape." Violence Against Women. 12 (4) 2006: 321-339
- Gwen Hunnicutt. "Varieties
of Patriarchy and Violence Against Women Resurrecting "Patriarchy" as a
Theoretical Tool." Violence Against Women. 15 (5)
2009: 553 - 573
- Tom W. Smith. "The
Polls: Gender and Attitudes Toward Violence." The Public Opinion
Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 1 (Spring, 1984), pp. 384-396
- Richard C. Eichenberg. "Gender
Differences In Public Attitudes Toward The Use Of Force By The United
States, 1990-2003." International Security 28.1 (2003) 110-141
- Jon Hurwitz and Shannon Smithey, "Gender
Differences on Crime and Punishment." Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 51, No. 1 (Mar., 1998), pp. 89-115
- Joan B. Kelly & Michael P. Johnson. "Differentiation
Among Types Of Intimate Partner Violence: Research Update And
Implications For Interventions." Family Court Review, Volume 46,
Issue 3, 2008 (p 476-499)
- Richard B. Felson, Alison C. Cares. "Gender
and the Seriousness of Assaults on Intimate Partners and Other Victims."
Journal of Marriage and Family, Volume 67, Issue 5 (2005):1182-1195
- Murray A. Straus and Ignacio Luis Ramirez. 2007. "Gender
Symmetry In Prevalence, Severity, And Chronicity Of Physical Aggression
Against Dating Partners By University Students In Mexico And USA."
Aggressive Behavior 33:281-290.
- Russell P. Dobash and R. Emerson Dobash. "Women's
Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships." The British Journal
of Criminology 44 (2004): 324-349
VIII. What role does ideology
play in determining the relations between men and women?
Ideology is near the center of almost all efforts to explain gender
inequalities. People's conceptions of masculinity and femininity,
ideas concerning the fairness of differential treatment or
expectations of women and men, internalized schema that evoke different
judgments of women's and men's actions, rules about proper male and
female behavior applied to children--all these and more concern the
influence of ideology on gender identities, differential treatment of
women and men, and the organization and persistence of gender
inequality. Conversely, each ideological belief that symbolizes,
legitimates, invokes, guides, induces, or helps sustain gender
inequality is itself a product of gender inequality. To untangle
these complex causal interdependencies, we must always attend carefully
to two kinds of distinctions. First, we must consistently
recognize differences in levels of social organization, including,
among others, societal structures and culture, organizations, social
networks, social processes, and individual actors. While it is
tempting to treat ideological beliefs as diffuse entities unconnected
to identifiable people, organizations, or structures, the analytical
results are poor. Second, we must consistently distinguish
between contemporaneous causes (e.g., the ways that internalized schema
can influence interactions) and asynchronous or historical causes
(e.g., the ways that changes in domestic production induce
different ideas about women's place).
- Analytical
Task
-
- Consider two aspects or two occurrences (e.g., in different
parts of a society or in different societies) of gender
inequality. One should involve direct relationships between women
and men, the other should concern a difference in the opportunities or
status available to women. Describe the principal patterns of the
inequality being considered.
- For each example of inequality, try to describe the most
important beliefs or ideas that motivate the practice of this type of
inequality and
those that legitimate it. Consider whether different beliefs
motivate or legitimate these types of inequality in different times,
places, or circumstances.
- For each example, try to explain how such beliefs or ideas
might arise as a result of the presence of the inequality that
they legitimate and motivate. To help think about this, consider:
-
- what if this aspect of gender inequality did not exist,
nor did the related beliefs, then this type of gender inequality came
into existence...how would ideas change? Consider what issues
might arise if this type of inequality existed, but the beliefs did
not, and how might the response to such issues lead to new beliefs.
- how do circumstances where this type of inequality is
minimal (different cultures, different historical periods, different
parts of society) compare to those where it is high?
- under
what conditions, if any, would the beliefs associated with this facet
of inequality exist without the presence of this facet of gender
inequality?
- how do people acquire these beliefs?
- what happens if some people question or reject the
beliefs?
- Common Readings
-
- Cecilia L. Ridgeway & Shelley J. Correll.. "Unpacking
the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and
Social Relations." Gender & Society, vol. 18, no. 4,
pp. 510-531, Aug 2004
- Judith Lorber. "Believing
is Seeing: Biology as Ideology." Gender and Society, Vol.
7, No. 4 (Dec., 1993), pp. 568-581
- Down So Long: Disputed Ideals: Ideologies
of Domesticity and Feminist Rebellion
- Destined for Equality: Institutional
Individualism
- Faye Ginsburg. "Procreation
Stories: Reproduction, Nurturance, and Procreation in Life Narratives
of Abortion Activists." American Ethnologist, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Nov.,
1987), pp. 623-636
- Kristin Luker. "Contraceptive
Risk Taking and Abortion: Results and Implications of a San Francisco
Bay Area Study." Studies in Family Planning, Vol. 8, No. 8
(Aug., 1977), pp. 190-196; and "The
War Between the Women." Family Planning Perspectives, Vol.
16, No. 3 (Mar. - Apr., 1984), pp. 105-110
- Nancy Burns and Katherine Gallagher. "Public Opinion on Gender Issues: The Politics of Equity and Roles." Annual Review of Political Science, 2010, Vol. 13: 425-443 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040507.142213
- Clem Brooks and Catherine Bolzendahl. "The
Transformation of US Gender Role Attitudes: Cohort Replacement,
Social-Structural Change, and Ideological Learning."
Volume: 33 Issue: 1 (2004 Mar): 106 - 133
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Shannon N. Davis, Theodore N. Greenstein. "Gender
Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences." Annual
Review of Sociology, Vol. 35 (2009): 87-105
- Carl N. Degler. "Revolution
without Ideology: The Changing Place of Women in America." Daedalus,
Vol. 93, No. 2, The Woman in America (Spring, 1964), pp. 653-670
- Bem, S. L. (1981) Gender
Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account Of Sex Typing. Psychological
Review, 88, 354-364.
- Review readings by Ridgeway in Section II and Valian in
Section VII
- Mary Blair-Loy. 2001. “Cultural
Constructions of Family Schemas: The Case of Women
Executives.” Gender & Society 15 (2001) : 687-709. - S. M. C. Kelley, C. G. E. Kelley, M. D. R. Evans and Jonathan
Kelley. "Support
for Mothers' Employment at Home: Conflict between Work and Family."
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol.
21, no. 1, pp. 98-110, Spring 2009
- Related
Readings
-
- Catherine I Bolzendahl, Daniel J Myers.. "Feminist
Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and
Men, 1974-1998." Social Forces, vol. 83, no. 2 (Dec 2004):
759-789
- Thornton, Arland; Young-DeMarco, Linda, "Four Decades of Trends in Attitudes toward Family Issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s." Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1009-1037, Nov 2001
- Emily W. Kane, Mimi Schippers. "Men's
and Women's Beliefs about Gender and Sexuality." Gender and
Society, Vol. 10, No. 5 (Oct., 1996), pp. 650-665
- Eric D. Widmer, Judith Treas, Robert Newcomb. "Attitudes
toward Nonmarital Sex in 24 Countries." The Journal of Sex
Research, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Nov., 1998), pp. 349-358...
- Bem, S, L, (1994)
Defending The Lenses of Gender. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 97-101.
- Frable, D. E., & Bem, S. L. (1985). If
You Are Gender Schematic, All Members Of The Opposite Sex Look Alike.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459-468.
IX. How has the economy
influenced men and women's positions in society?
Essentially all analyses of gender inequality give
great importance to the economy. Gender inequality appears
everywhere embedded in economic inequality, in the sense that a
critical aspect of gender inequality involves unequal access to
economic resources and positions. Sometimes this is understood as
an expression of gender inequality, sometimes a cause of gender
inequality, sometimes a result. Many analyses consider it all three.
- Analytical
Task
-
- Describe two examples of atypical (but not rare oddities)
circumstances in which women may have higher economic status or
economy-related status than men (e.g., wives who earn more than their
husbands).
- Pure economic inequality between women and men would
require that every man has an economic status and economic
opportunities greater than every woman. Realistically, such pure
economic inequality by gender does not appear in any society.
- While our interest lies in what causes or sustains the
economic facets of gender inequality, in this task we approach the
contested terrain indirectly, by first considering exceptions,
conditions where some women have a better economic location then some
men.
- For each example (of the two you choose), try to explain
briefly both (1) what conditions or processes ensure that it is
atypical and (2) similarly explain what conditions or
processes allow the atypical examples to arise.
-
- in developing your explanations, consider the actions of
both women and men, as well as differences in the opportunities and
constraints they typically face
- consider also how other kinds of relevant people respond
to such atypical arrangements
- try to take into account the orientation and actions of
both people with power and ordinary people who lack it
- Common Readings
-
- Barbara F. Reskin. "Bringing
the Men Back in: Sex Differentiation and the Devaluation of Women's Work."
Gender and Society, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Mar., 1988), pp. 58-81
- Destined for Equality: Employment: Gaining
Equality from the Economy
- Christine L. Williams. "The
Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the "Female" Professions,"
Social Problems, Vol. 39, No. 3 (Aug., 1992), pp.
253-267
- Eagly, Alice H., and Linda L. Carli. "Women
and the Labyrinth of Leadership." Harvard Business Review 85, no. 9
(September 2007): 63-71.
- Claudia Goldin, Cecilia Rouse. "Orchestrating
Impartiality: The Impact of "Blind" Auditions on Female Musicians."
The American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 4 (Sep.,
2000), pp. 715-741
- England, Paula. “Gender
Inequality in Labor Markets: The Role of Motherhood and Segregation.”
Social Politics 12 (2005):264-288.
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Francine D. Blau. "Trends
in the Well-Being of American Women, 1970-1995." Journal of
Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No. 1 (Mar., 1998), pp. 112-165
- Francine D. Blau and Lawrence M. Kahn. “The
Gender Pay Gap: Have Women Gone as Far as They Can?” Academy of
Management Perspectives 21 (February 2007): 7-23. [Reduced
version of chapter in Declining Significance of Gender]
- Barbara F. Reskin, "Including
Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality: 2002 Presidential
Address", American Sociological Review,
Vol. 68, No. 1 (Feb., 2003), pp. 1-21
- Michelle J Budig. "Male
Advantage And The Gender Composition Of Jobs: Who Rides The Glass
Escalator?" Social Problems. May 2002. Vol. 49, Iss. 2; p.
258
- Elizabeth H. Gorman and Julie A. Kmec. "Hierarchical
Rank and Women’s Organizational Mobility: Glass Ceilings in Corporate
Law Firms." American Journal of Sociology Volume 114 Number
5 (March 2009): 1428–74
- Christine E. Bose, Philip L. Bereano and Mary Malloy. "Household
Technology and the Social Construction of Housework." Technology
and Culture, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Jan., 1984), pp. 53-82
- Maria Charles. "Deciphering
Sex Segregation: Vertical and Horizontal Inequalities in Ten National
Labor Markets." Acta Sociologica, Vol. 46, No. 4 (Dec.,
2003), pp. 267-287
- Shelley J. Correll, Stephen Benard, In Paik. "Getting
a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?" American Journal of
Sociology, Vol. 112, No. 5 (Mar., 2007), pp. 1297-1338
- Louise Marie Roth.
Women on Wall Street: Despite Diversity Measures, Wall Street Remains
Vulnerable to Sex Discrimination Charges. Academy of Management
Perspectives, Feb 2007, Vol. 21
- Judge, Timothy A.; Livingston, Beth A. "Is
The Gap More Than Gender? A Longitudinal Analysis Of Gender, Gender
Role Orientation, And Earnings." Journal of Applied
Psychology. Vol 93(5), Sep 2008, 994-1012.
- Claudia Goldin. "The
Changing Economic Role of Women: A Quantitative Approach." Journal
of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 13, No. 4, The Measure of
American History (Spring, 1983), pp. 707-733
- Claudia Goldin. "The
Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and
Family." The American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 2 (May,
2006), pp. 1-21
- Valerie Kincade Oppenheimer. "Demographic
Influence on Female Employment and the Status of Women." American
Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 4, Changing Women in a Changing
Society (Jan., 1973), pp. 946-961; see also Valerie K. Oppenheimer. "The
Interaction of Demand and Supply and its Effect on the Female Labour
Force in the United States." Population Studies, Vol. 21,
No. 3 (Nov., 1967), pp. 239-259
- England, Paula, Paul Allison, and Yuxiao Wu. “Does
Feminization Lower Wages, Do Declines in Wages Cause Feminization, and
How Can We Tell From Longitudinal Data?” Social Science Research
36(3) (2007): 1237-56.
- Trond Petersen, Vemund Snartland, Eva M. Meyersson Milgrom. "Are female workers less productive than male workers?" Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 25(1) (2006): 13-37.
- Related
Readings
-
- Claudia Goldin, Lawrence F. Katz, Ilyana Kuziemko. "The
Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College
Gender Gap." The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20,
No. 4 (Fall, 2006), pp. 133-156
- Jerry A. Jacobs. "Gender
Inequality and Higher Education." Annual Review of Sociology,
Vol. 22 (1996): 153-185
- Claudia Buchmann, Thomas A. DiPrete, Anne McDaniel. "Gender
Inequalities in Education." Annual Review of Sociology,
Vol. 34 (2008): 319-337
- England, Paula and Su Li. “Desegregation
Stalled: The Changing Gender Composition of College Majors, 1971-2002.”
Gender & Society 20 (2006):657-677.
- M. Evertsson, P. England, I. Mooi-Reci, J. Hermsen, J. de
Bruijn, D. Cotter. "Is
Gender Inequality Greater at Lower or Higher Educational Levels? Common
Patterns in the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States." Social
Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society
16(2):210-241 (2009)
- Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M.
L. (2003). Transformational,
transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis
comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
- Eckel, Catherine; de Oliveira, Angela C. M.; Grossman, Philip
J. "Gender
and Negotiation in the Small: Are Women (Perceived to Be) More
Cooperative than Men?" Negotiation Journal, Volume 24,
Issue 4, 2008: 429 ; Kolb, Deborah M. "Too
Bad for the Women or Does It Have to Be? Gender and Negotiation
Research over the Past Twenty-Five Years." Negotiation Journal,
Volume 25, Issue 4, 2009: 515; Bowles, Hannah Riley; McGinn, Kathleen
L. "Gender
in Job Negotiations: A Two-Level Game." Negotiation
Journal, Volume 24, Issue 4, 2008: 393
- Sue Bowden, Avner Offer. "Household
Appliances and the Use of Time: The United States and Britain Since the
1920s." The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 47,
No. 4 (Nov., 1994), pp. 725-748
- Graciela Chichilnisky. "The
Gender Gap." Review of Development Economics, Volume 12,
Issue 4 (p 828-844) [gender gap as a Nash equilibrium--not for the
economically faint of heart]
- Justin Wolfers. "Diagnosing
Discrimination: Stock Returns and Ceo Gender" Journal of
the European Economic Association, Vol. 4, No. 2/3, Papers and
Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Congress of the European Economic
Association (Apr. - May, 2006), pp. 531-541
- Francine D. Blau and Lawrence M. Kahn. “The
Gender Pay Gap,” The Economists’ Voice (June 2007).
- Claudia Goldin. "The
Long Road to the Fast Track: Career and Family." The Annals Of
The American Academy Of Political And Social Science. 2004 596
(2004): 20-35.
- Claudia D. Goldin. "The
Role of World War II in the Rise of Women's Employment." The
American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 4 (Sep., 1991), pp. 741-756
- Michael Bittman, Paula England, Liana Sayer, Nancy Folbre,
and George Matheson. “When
Does Gender Trump Money?: Bargaining and Time in Household Work.” American
Journal of Sociology 109 (2003):186-214.
-
X. How have men resisted
and furthered change? How have women furthered and resisted
change?
Both women and men have acted in every possible way
towards gender inequality. What we want to understand are the
circumstances in which they predictably act in ways that either
reinforce or erode inequality. People's actions complex results
of interests, ideology, circumstance, opportunity, and
constraint.
- Analytical
Task
-
- Select one kind or aspect of gender inequality. Clearly state how this is an inequality, specifying
- what kinds of women and men are unequal,
- how this inequality manifests itself, and
- how things look different when the inequality is great compared to when it is small.
- With respect to this type of inequality, offer two or more examples of each of the following:
- actions by men that help sustain the inequality,
- actions by men that contribute to eroding the inequality,
- actions by women that help sustain the inequality and
- actions by women that contribute to eroding the inequality.
- Try to specify the range of circumstances that more often produce each of these four types of action.
- Can you distill your observations into a couple generalizations?
- Common Readings
-
- Recommended
Readings
-
- Noah P. Mark, Lynn Smith‐Lovin, and Cecilia L. Ridgeway. "Why
Do Nominal Characteristics Acquire Status Value? A Minimal Explanation
for Status Construction." AJS Volume 115 Number 3 (November
2009): 832–62 ....
- Kirsten Dellinger. "Masculinities
in "Safe" and "Embattled" Organizations: Accounting for Pornographic
and Feminist Magazines." Gender & Society, vol. 18, no.
5, pp. 545-566, Oct 2004...
- Carl N. Degler. "Charlotte
Perkins Gilman on the Theory and Practice of Feminism." American
Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Spring, 1956), pp. 21-39
- Jo Freeman. "Political
Organization in the Feminist Movement." Acta Sociologica,
Vol. 18, No. 2/3 (1975), pp. 222-244
- Emily Stoper, Roberta Ann Johnson. "The
Weaker Sex & the Better Half: The Idea of Women's Moral Superiority
in the American Feminist Movement." Polity, Vol. 10, No. 2
(Winter, 1977), pp. 192-217
- Ann-Dorte Christensen and Jørgen Elm Larsen. "Gender, Class, and Family: Men and Gender Equality in a Danish Context. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2008 15:53-78
- ...
- Related
Readings
-
- ...
- Holly J. McCammon, Courtney Sanders Muse, Harmony D. Newman,
and Teresa M. Terrell. "Movement
Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures: The Political Successes
of the U.S. Women's Jury Movements." American Sociological
Review 2007 72: 725-749.
- Elsie Clews Parsons. "Feminism
and Conventionality." Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science, Vol. 56, Women in Public Life (Nov.,
1914), pp. 47-53
- Catherine Hakim. "Five Feminist
Myths about Women's Employment." The British Journal of
Sociology, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Sep., 1995), pp. 429-455
- Linda Thompson, Alexis J. Walker. "Gender in
Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood." Journal
of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 51, No. 4 (Nov., 1989), pp.
845-871
- See also from Section II above, Deniz Kandiyoti, "Bargaining
with Patriarchy"."
XI. How have political
processes and structures sustained men's and women's relative status?
- Analytical
Task
- Select one kind or aspect of political or power inequality between women and men. Clearly state how this is an inequality, specifying
- what kinds of women and men are unequal,
- how this inequality manifests itself in the unequal treatment of women and men or unequal outcomes for them, and
- how things look different when the inequality is great compared to when it is small.
- Specify two instances where this type of inequality is large and two where it is small.
- what effects on other kinds of inequality have the selected instances of political or power inequality?
- what circumstances or processes seem to explain why it is large in two cases and small in the other two?
- can you make any generalization about the circumstances or processes you have just used to explain the differences?
- Common Readings
- Destined for Equality: Citizenship: Gaining
Equality from the State
- Joyce Gelb, Marian Lief Palley. "Women and Interest Group Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Federal Decision-Making." The Journal of Politics, Vol. 41, No. 2 (May, 1979), pp. 362-392.
- Lynne Haney. "Homeboys,
Babies, Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Male Dominance."
American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 5 (Oct., 1996),
pp. 759-778
-
Pamela Paxton, Sheri Kunovich, Melanie M. Hughes. "Gender in Politics." Annual Review of Sociology 2007 33, 263-284
- Down So Long: The Reproduction of Economic and
Political Power
- Recommended
Readings
- Ann Shola Orloff. "Gendering
the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda."
Sociological Theory 27(3):317-343 (2009)
- Karen Beckwith. "Women's
Movements At Century's End: Excavation and Advances in Political Science."
Annual Review of Political Science 2001 4, 371-390
- Torben Iversen, Frances Rosenbluth. "The
Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the
Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap." American
Journal of Political Science, Vol. 50, No. 1 (Jan., 2006), pp. 1-19
- Pamela Johnston Conover. "Feminists and the Gender Gap." The Journal of Politics, Vol. 50, No. 4 (Nov., 1988), pp. 985-1010
- Related
Readings
- Karen Beckwith. "The Comparative Politics of Women's Movements." Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 3, No. 3 (Sep., 2005), pp. 583-596
- Vicky Randall. "Legislative Gender Quotas and Indian Exceptionalism: The Travails of the Women's Reservation Bill." Comparative Politics, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Oct., 2006), pp. 63-82
- Guillaume R. Fréchette, Francois Maniquet, Massimo Morelli. "Incumbents' Interests and Gender Quotas." American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Oct., 2008), pp. 891-909
-
Lynne A. Haney. "Feminist State Theory: Applications to Jurisprudence, Criminology, and the Welfare State." Annual Review of Sociology 26:641-666 (2000)
- Richard L. Fox, Jennifer L. Lawless. "Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office." American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 2 (Apr., 2004), pp. 264-280
- Kira Sanbonmatsu. "Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice." American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, No. 1 (Jan., 2002), pp. 20-34.
- Marvin Harris. "Caste,
Class, and Minority." Social Forces, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Mar.,
1959), pp. 248-254
- Frank F. Furstenberg, Jr. "History and Current Status of Divorce in the United States." The Future of Children, Vol. 4, No. 1, Children and Divorce (Spring, 1994), pp. 29-43..
XII. What does the future
hold?
- Analytical
Task
- Select
two types of inequality, both important, one that you believe to be
moving toward greater equality at a relatively high rate, the other
that you believe is moving toward equality at a relatively slow rate
(or is stalled or is moving backwards)
- for each of these two types, describe what is the inequality
(how are women and men unequal, which women and men experience it, how
do things differ when this inequality is high from when it is low)
- describe the evidence and logic that suggests one type is declining relatively quickly and the other relatively slowly
- Try to explain why the two different rates of movement toward equality
- For each, consider what processes, conditions, interests, and the like propel the movement toward greater equality
- For each, consider what circumstances, activities, and the like obstruct the movement toward greater equality
- Try to explain how and why the balance between the causes
propelling greater equality and the causes sustaining existing
inequality differ between the two types of gender inequality
- Common Readings