Image1    Cubism became one of the most revolutionary art movements of the early 20th century. Developed in Paris by Picasso, Braque and many other artist, it soon developed into a mode of vision that was utilized, copied and imitated by artists throughout Europe and other parts of the world. Many artists in Latin America as well as Latin American artists living abroad were attracted to the radical transformations of space and the dislocations of traditional artistic form that Cubism represented. The dilemma existed, however, of how to create something original, something that would represent both a personal statement and a recognizably "Latin American" brand of Cubism. This challenge was taken up by many artists with greater and lesser degrees of success.

Diego Rivera had gone to Europe in 1907. By 1909 he was spending the majority of his time in Paris where he remained until the early 1920s. During the years 1914, 1915, 1916 and 1917 he engaged with Cubism in a direct manner, becoming a significant member of what might be termed the second generation of Cubist painters. He embraced the "traditional" subject matter of Cubism: still lifes, landscapes and portraits. In many of these, such as his most famous work in this genre the Zapatista Landscape of 1915, he demonstrated a unique power of synthesis of both Analytical and Synthetic Cubism with distinct references to specific Mexican themes. After 1917, however, he drifted away from this style and his art began to evidence the impact of Cezanne, Degas and Renoir as well as a continuation of a form of classicism which he was taught at the Academy in Mexico City. The reminiscences of Cubist form, however, would always be present in one way or another in his art.

Tarsila do Amaral, was born in the same year as Rivera (1886) in Sao Paulo state (Brazil). From a well-to-do family, she traveled often as a child and a young woman to Europe. During the 1920s she spent considerable time in Paris where she associated with Andre Lhote and Fernand Leger as well as Constantin Brancusi. Evidence of the styles of all of these artists may be found in her work. Tarsila, however, created a uniquely Brazilian brand of Cubism. Her painting from c.1923 to about 1927 is described as her "Pau Brasil" period, so named for the indigenous type of wood produced in her native country. Later she entered into her "Antropofagia" phase - something of a hybrid of Cubism, Surrealism and references to specific Brazilian themes. Tarsila produced her major paintings in the 1920s, turning to social realism and other styles later on.

Emilio Pettoruti was born in La Plata, Argentina in 1892. As a young artist he spent many years living in Florence, Milan and Paris, beginning in 1912. He also had an important exhibition of his work in Berlin. Pettoruti's formation took place within the ambience of Italian Futurism and he is also associated with Cubism. Pettoruti's art forms a highly interesting synthesis of the stimuli with which he was faced abroad. Upon his return to Buenos Aires he showed his Cubo-Futurist works in a gallery and caused a "scandal" in the rather conservative society. While many of Pettoruti's paintings bear little of a specifically "Argentinian" stamp, a number of themes that he developed in the 1920s, such as those of street musicians (and tango bands) may be related to the ambience of the city in which he lived for many years.

A case study of 3 artists who incorporated elements of Cubist style may teach us a substantial amount about the methods of appropriation and transformation that lie at the heart of Latin American modernism


Home

Related links:

Image 2 
Image 3 
Image 4 
Image 5 
Image 6 
Image 7 
Image 8 
Image 9 
Image 10 
Image 11 
Image 12 
Image 13 
Image 14
Image 15
Image 16
Image 17
Topic 3 Readings