Liz Heard
Performance
The word performance is used in a several fields, including but
not limited to athletics, the arts, technology, and human behavior.
While meanings vary according to usage, performance often
seems to imply a relationship to an absolute value or standard.
Webster’s 1977 New Collegiate Dictionary offers five definitions of
performance:
1 a: the execution of an action
b: something accomplished : DEED, FEAT
2: the fulfillment of a claim, promise, or request : IMPLEMENTATION
3 a: the action of representing a character in a play
b: a public presentation or exhibition <a benefit ~ >
4 a: the ability to perform : EFFICIENCY
b: the manner in which a mechanism performs <Engine ~ >
5: the manner of reacting to stimuli : BEHAVIOR" (851).
With the exception of definition 5, all these definitions suggest an
absolute towards which the action of performance strives. Words
like "accomplish," fulfillment," "representing," and the phrase "the
manner in which" all imply a standard beyond and outside the
performative action or event to which the performance is
compared.
Everyday use of performance in all the fields mentioned above
reveal an implication of hierarchical rating based on an absolute
standard. The September 10 New York Daily News sports section
reports that "Many athletes believe they give a superior
performance only through luck – some convergence of conditions
at least partly outside of their control" (7). "Superior" modifying
performance suggests such a rated value standard. Similarly, the
motor oil advertised as "high performance" promises something
that at least approaches maximum efficiency and power from an
automobile. In the field of arts, reviewing the Public Theater’s
summer program in Central Park, a friend praised the
"professional performance" of last year’s production of The
Misanthrope. "Professional" suggests a performance based on
actor training and craft as well as directorial interpretation in
accordance with acceptable interpretations of the play script.
Everyday human behavior is often referred to in terms of
performance. Employees, for instance, undergo routine
"performance evaluations" to assess and document their
efficiency on the job. Sex is also seen as a performance. In a
recent Ann Landers column entitled "Is he straying? How to Spot a
Cheater," decreased sexual "performance" was cited in a list of
clues to marital infidelity: "2. Your husband suddenly loses interest
in sex, cuts back drastically on the frequency or suddenly cannot
perform" (20). Sex as performance also appeared in an overheard
conversation: "When I’m with her, I feel like, a pressure to perform
in bed." The "pressure" experienced by the speaker suggests that
his partner expects him to arouse in her an optimal level of sexual
excitement and satisfaction.
Western performance arts reflect this aspect of performance in
a prioritizing of the signifier, or what a performance is meant to
represent. As noted in Patrice Pavis’ Dictionary of the Theatre,
performance is often seen as secondary to that which it attempts
to represent: "Representation is always a recreation of something
– a past event, a historical figure or a real object; hence the
impression that it reveals only a secondary reality" (262). Western
prioritizing of empirical evidence such as the written word over
transitory experience means that a fixed text or score is valued over
its ephemeral, unrecordable performance. However, Pavis asserts
an equal validity for performance representation against the
absolute nature of what it is "trying" to signify. Any single
performance can never be repeated and stands, therefore,
independent of any fixed meaning. Furthermore, performance
realizes more completely a script or score, which exists in a
reduced and partial form outside of performance. It is only in the
experience of shared, created meaning between the performer
and audience that a script or score is fully realized
David Summer’s article "Representation" traces changing
attitudes towards representation in Western thinking beginning
with Plato’s description of artist’s representations as poor copies
of ideal forms and ending with Summer’s conclusion that
representation is both generated in and generative of material,
social reality. There is no absolute outside representation except
perhaps the material world, and that world we continue to shape
and form, partly through representation. Representation, including
performance, is neither greater nor lesser than what it tries to
signify: "An alternative may be offered by pushing idealist (and
materialist) representation beyond imaginative formation to the
construction of the actually formed and shaped implicit in the idea
of formation" (15).
If representation, including performative representation, is both
generated by and generative of cultural reality, the question of an
ideal standing outside and above no longer pertains.
Nevertheless, values do remain, and therefore, so does the
question of absolute value. I return to "When I’m with her, I feel like,
a pressure to perform in bed" and add to it a quote from a
performance work entitled Correct Me if I’m Wrong. "When her
friends were around, my mother would stroke my hair and tell me
what a beautiful child I was. It was like she was performing for
them, performing her affection for me." These statements imply
values that oppose performance against spontaneity in intimate
human relationships. The question of performance as falsity, a
"poor copy," returns. Another question arises: does emotional
spontaneity spring naturally from our "essential" nature, or from an
improvisatory, yet still performed response?