Cocktail Renaissance: The Re-emergence and Re-Invention of the Cocktail Way of Life Richard McKewan Back around 1990, at Boston's Paradise Club, during an evening billed as the "Tiki Wonder Hour," a then-unknown band called Combustible Edison seemed one huge anachronism. Dressed in white tuxes and frilly shirts and wearing gold chains, the band seemed from a time- warp, featuring vibraphones and doing songs like "Cry Me a River." Between numbers, the band's frontman, known as "The Millionaire," read out the First Manifesto of The Cocktail Nation, which stated in part: "We, the Citizens of the Cocktail Nation, do hereby declare our independence from the dessicated horde of mummified uniformity - our freedom from an existence of abject swinglessness. We pledge to revolt against the void of dictated sobriety and to cultivate not riches but richness, swankness, suaveness and strangeness, with pleasure and boldness for all." In the eight or so years since the Millionaire's proclamation, an entire cocktail lounge culture has arisen, complete with lounge fashion and style, lounge music, and an entire lounge aesthetic; "lounge" was transformed into an adjective. In my paper, (1) I examine the rise of the contemporary cocktail lounge culture, (2) I try to pin down what precisely is meant by "lounge" (as a noun, as an adjective, and as an aesthetic), and finally, (3) I point out some feminist, post-colonial, and racial critiques of "lounge." Since the cocktail is fundamental to the ontology of the cocktail lounge, I begin my analysis by examining the cocktail itself. Within the American imaginary it has been endowed with a surfeit of meaning, and therein lies its symbolic power. In the words of "The Millionaire," the cocktail "is one of those elegant symbols where the very sight of it means something, and the more you think about it, the more aspects you discover that relate to everything." In my paper I show how the cocktail's ability to "relate to everything" comes about by means of profound ambiguities ^× the historical ways in which the cocktail has simultaneously marked, for example, class and criminality, the social and the individual, civility and licentiousness. Second, I examine how the cocktail and its ambiguities become embodied in the cocktail lounge. Like other drinking establishments, the lounge offers an escape from the demands of daily existence. Kavadlo contends that the lounge differs from bars and taverns in the way that it "promotes its form of escape by utilizing a combination of virtually all of the sensations and emotions." Using this formulation as a starting point, I try to develop a sensorium of the lounge drawing on historical accounts of lounges and my own experiences in them. I focus particularly on music, since the current revival has, to a large part, centered on (and been marketed through) music. It is through my analysis of the lounge as a space that I try to come up with a definition of "lounge" as an adjective, an aesthetic, or an overarching principle. While I do make some headway in describing "lounge-ness," in the end I get little further than a tautology: "lounges define lounge-ness" and "lounge-ness defines lounges." At first this may seem totally not-useful. However, according to the Second Manifesto of the Cocktail Nation, the "Doctrine of Inauthenticity" states that inauthenticity is the "active principle of the exalted state of fabulousness . . . That a thing is the original is no guarantee that it is the best. That a thing is not ^Ñreal' does not mean that it is ^Ñfalse'". What could be more "inauthentic" than an entire aesthetic based on a tautology? I link this privileging of inauthenticity to the ambiguities and contradictions inherent in the cocktail. In the final part of the paper, I articulate some critiques of the lounge revival. The historical period that the revival "emulates" (i.e., late 50s through early 60s) was virulently sexist, racist, and homophobic. These biases surface most noticeably in some of the lounge music that has been "re-discovered" from this period, albums entitled "Afro-desia," "Rituals of the Savage," and the like. In formulating a response to would-be critics, I cite the Doctrine of Inauthenticity just mentioned. The lounge movement does not "emulate" a sexist, racist past. It doesn't "emulate" anything, for emulation would imply some sort of privileged "original" that one is trying to approach. Rather, a newly re-imagined and newly re-invented lounge is what is truly fabulous. I would hope that this new lounge could be freed or absolved of the evils of any perceived antecedent. However, I realize that hiding behind a postmodern screen of irony fails in a certain way to address the critique. In the end, all I can do is chalk it up to yet another ambiguity of the lounge's quintessence, the cocktail. Richard McKewen * "Phallologocentrism was the egg rqm9261@is.nyu.edu * ovulated by the master subject, Dept of Performance Studies * the brooding hen to the permanent Tisch School of the Arts * chickens of history." New York University * --Donna Haraway ---------------------------------------------------------------------- P.O. Box 236 Cooper Station New York, NY 10276-0236 (718) 726-8778