8. Evaluation
a. Describe the institution's provisions for periodic review of the quality and effectiveness of its academic programs, including evidence of student achievement, accomplishments of graduates, faculty performance, etc.
b. Submit a site visit report by at least two nationally recognized authorities in the discipline, external to New York State, and agreed to in advance by the Doctoral Program Review Office. The names and vitae of at least three potential reviewers should be submitted to the Office of Academic Program Review, for consultation with the State Education Department, as early as possible in the process of preparing the proposal. This will save time. The reviewer should use the Evaluation Instructions and Report Form (PDF) for Doctoral Program Proposals to evaluate the quality and viability of the proposed program in terms of governance, curriculum, faculty, students, facilities, and other resources. A single team is preferred. Also include in the proposal materials the institution's response to the site visit report, fully addressing any concerns raised by the reviewers. If appropriate, indicate where changes have been made in the proposal in response to the site visit report.
Abstract: Prepare a one-or two-page summary of the proposal which briefly sets forth:
1. the title of the proposed program, the four-digit HEGIS code in which the program should be categorized (to be obtained from the Office of Academic Program Review), and the degree, diploma, or certificate to which it leads;
2. the purpose and goals of the program and its relationship to the stated mission of the institution and to existing offerings of the institution;
3. the curriculum;
4. any unique characteristics of the program;
5. requirements for admission to the program;
6. the nature of the prospective student body (geographic origin, age, racial/ethnic characteristics, any other pertinent information);
7. projected (full- and part-time) enrollment in the program’s first and fifth year of operation;
8. facilities, equipment, faculty, and other academic resources available, and planned to be acquired, to support the proposed program;
9. prospects for employment/further education for the program’s graduates; and,
10. any additional basis of the need for the program.