New York University Skip to Content Skip to Search Skip to Navigation Skip to Sub Navigation

NYU Researchers Question Effectiveness of Surveillance Cameras in Reducing Crime

February 26, 2009
N-309, 2008-09

Despite the increased use of electronic surveillance devices, including closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, in public and privately owned housing complexes in New York City, there is little evidence that such sophisticated electronic monitoring reduces the incidence of crime, according to an impact analysis by researchers at New York University.

However, the study’s authors caution that that further research is warranted before a definitive evaluation of the efficacy of electronic monitoring in reducing crime can be made.

Analyzing crime data from Manhattan’s Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town for a period of five years, from January 1, 2002 through December 2006, David F. Greenberg, professor of sociology, and Jeffrey B. Roush, an operations management consultant for EMA Inc., examined the degree to which incidences of crime dropped in the two housing complexes following the introduction of an integrated security management system at the end of 2004. The system included the installation of CCTV, door alarm monitoring, proximity card access, and emergency call boxes.

The results of the study were published in the February 2009 issue of Evaluation Review.

Following a statistical analysis of crime rates within Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town, as well as for crime rates of Manhattan’s 13th Precinct, in which the housing complexes are located, the authors found no persuasive evidence that the introduction of CCTV and other electronic monitoring devices reduced crime in Peter Cooper Village. They did, however, find stronger evidence for reduction in minor crime, such as larceny, in Stuyvesant Town.

The authors used an enhanced methodology which will allow governments, large university campuses or property managers to evaluate crime deterrence if they install surveillance equipment. The new methodology is described in detail in the report.

In their conclusion, the authors write, “Though not definitive, our results suggest CCTV may be moderately effective in preventing minor crimes or in diverting them to distant areas.” However, the effects of CCTV on more serious crimes could not be gauged precisely, they note, because of the low incidence of serious crime in both Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town prior to the introduction of electronic monitoring.

Reporters interested in speaking with the authors can contact Tim Farrell in the NYU Office of Public Affairs by phone at 212.998.6797 or by email at tim.farrell@nyu.edu.

This Press Release is in the following Topics:
Research, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development

Type: Press Release


Search News



NYU In the News

Paying It Backward: NYU Alum Funds Scholarships

The Wall Street Journal profiled Trustee Evan Chesler on why he decided to chair the Momentum fund-raising campaign.

A Nobel Prize Party: Cheese, Bubbles, and a Boson

The New Yorker talked to Professor Kyle Cranmer and graduate student Sven Kreiss about NYU’s role in the discovery of the Higgs boson, which resulted in a Nobel prize for the scientists who predicted its existence.

The World as They Knew It

The New York Times reviewed the exhibit at the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World on how ancient Greeks and Romans mapped the known and unknown areas of their world.

Elite Institutions: Far More Diverse Than They Were 20 Years Ago

NYU made stronger gains over the last 20 years in increasing diversity than any other major research university, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Program Seeks to Nurture ‘Data Science Culture’
at Universities

The New York Times reported on the multi-million collaboration among NYU and two other universities to harness the potential of Big Data, including an interview with Professor Yann LeCun, director of NYU’s Center for Data Science.

NYU Footer