New York University Skip to Content Skip to Search Skip to Navigation Skip to Sub Navigation

NYU School of Law Launches Institute for Study of Regulation

May 16, 2008
N-460, 2007-08

New York University School of Law has established the Institute for the Study of Regulation (ISR), a non-partisan advocacy organization and think tank dedicated to improving the quality of governmental decisionmaking in environmental, public health, and safety regulation. Housed within the School of Law’s Center for Environmental and Land Use Law, ISR will be composed of law school faculty, a board of advisors of academic and public policy experts, and fellows. NYU School of Law Dean Richard Revesz will serve as ISR’s faculty director.

ISR’s principal goal will be to implement the vision described in the new book Retaking Rationality: How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health by Revesz and Michael Livermore, who will be ISR’s executive director beginning in August. The book, published this month by Oxford University Press, advocates using properly conducted cost-benefit analysis as a tool to advance socially beneficial regulation.

For the past 25 years, progressive groups such as environmentalists and labor unions have declined to participate in the government’s cost-benefit analyses of federal environmental regulations because cost-benefit analysis seemed to place a dollar value on human life and natural resources. By making that choice, they essentially ceded this ground to industry groups, which captured cost-benefit analysis and used it to further their anti-regulatory objectives. The resulting imbalance in political participation has been harmful to the environment and public health.

ISR will work with non-governmental organizations and state and federal regulators and will publish reports, policy briefs, and papers to demonstrate that economic analysis is necessary and that it needn’t conflict with - and can in fact support - a more compassionate approach to environmental and public health policy.

“Without cost-benefit analysis, we are essentially regulating in the dark, a bad idea when regulations can cost billions of dollars, and smart regulation can save lives,” Revesz said. “By fighting to mend, rather than end, cost-benefit analysis, environmentalists can retake the high ground and win the fight for strong regulation.”

For more information about ISR and Retaking Rationality, please visit

This Press Release is in the following Topics:
School of Law

Type: Press Release

Press Contact: Michael Orey | (914) 340-5555


Search News

NYU In the News

Paying It Backward: NYU Alum Funds Scholarships

The Wall Street Journal profiled Trustee Evan Chesler on why he decided to chair the Momentum fund-raising campaign.

A Nobel Prize Party: Cheese, Bubbles, and a Boson

The New Yorker talked to Professor Kyle Cranmer and graduate student Sven Kreiss about NYU’s role in the discovery of the Higgs boson, which resulted in a Nobel prize for the scientists who predicted its existence.

The World as They Knew It

The New York Times reviewed the exhibit at the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World on how ancient Greeks and Romans mapped the known and unknown areas of their world.

Elite Institutions: Far More Diverse Than They Were 20 Years Ago

NYU made stronger gains over the last 20 years in increasing diversity than any other major research university, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Program Seeks to Nurture ‘Data Science Culture’
at Universities

The New York Times reported on the multi-million collaboration among NYU and two other universities to harness the potential of Big Data, including an interview with Professor Yann LeCun, director of NYU’s Center for Data Science.

NYU Footer